Due pinout diagram

Graynomad:

has the TWI on the top near the reset no pull-ups

No pullups on the main I2C.

Strange why, difference between them?

Btw. On PB14 &PB15 is an another CAN Controller CAN1

Strange why, difference between them?

No idea, probably becaise SCL1 and SDA1 are the standard I2C signals and old shields don't expect pullups, whereas SCL and SDA are new so thay can ba added.

On PB14 &PB15 is an another CAN Controller CAN1

Yep, got them.


Rob

PA30:31 are only available on the 217-pin chip.

Turns out the datasheet I was looking at is only the Summary data sheet - only shows the 100 & 144 pin packages. Didn't realize there was a 217 pin package as well.

@Nantonos
Sorry, I just realised the earlier versions were actually JPEGs. Fixed now.

@all
Latest version just uploaded.


Rob

Graynomad:
@all
Latest version just uploaded.

The CANTX1 and some others are white, is that because its' not supported yet?, or should those be blue?

If anyone could confirm the SPI situation now..

They are on the schematic so at some point someone decided to at least label the nets. There's no mention of a second CAN on the product page so it looks like it's not yet supported and I've left them white. Likewise for the fourth USART and I doubt the SPI ability of two of the USARTs will ever be supported, but I think some people may want to use that one day.

BTW, does anyone know if the power jack is a 2.1 or a 2.5mm type?


Rob

Hi,

I new to this forum, although I use already since long AVR processors. Recently I bought an Arduino DUE.

The DUE pinout diagram is really awesome !! Great piece of work.

I think there are some minor errors:

  1. port B.26 is not "TIOA0", but "TCLK0" (per B)
  2. port B.16 is on physical pin 77 (not 78)
  3. "TIOB7" (PWM10) is on pin 102 port C.29 (not 111 / A28)
    Anyway please double check.

Perhaps you could also add the following:

  • on A.19 "PWMH1" (per B)
  • on C.19 "PWMH5" (per B)
  • on B.14 "PWMH2" (per B)
  • on C.18 "PWMH6" (per B)
  • on A.20 "PWML2" (per B)
  • on C.9 "PWMH3" (per B)
  • on C.7 "PWMH2" (per B)
  • on C.5 "PWMH1" (per B)
  • on C.3 "PWMH0" (per B)
  • on D.6 "PWMFI2" (per B)

best,
-D

This is just a first attempt and it's not finished.

Nice!

I would say but it looks good!

Graynomad:
BTW, does anyone know if the power jack is a 2.1 or a 2.5mm type?

Power jack is 2.1

Hi,

I think you need to swap 5V and GND on the ICSP connector.

Maybe you could also add a comment that TX0 & RX0 are connected to the Mega16U2 (for programming).

-D

neslekkim:
I guess you are going to mark the usb ports also? which is native, which is programming, strange that they are not labeled on the board..

Yes, I wondered, too. Then I turned the board over ....

Msquare:

neslekkim:
I guess you are going to mark the usb ports also? which is native, which is programming, strange that they are not labeled on the board..

Yes, I wondered, too. Then I turned the board over ....

Ah, maybe, but I have mounted it on an tamiya plate :slight_smile:

If you look closely you can tell the difference. The native port has a micro AB socket which is more rectangular. The programming port has a micro B socket which has diagonal bottom corners.

Msquare:

neslekkim:
I guess you are going to mark the usb ports also? which is native, which is programming, strange that they are not labeled on the board..

Yes, I wondered, too. Then I turned the board over ....

Actually, I checked under the board now, There is no marking for the usb plugs.
Begins to wonder if Arduino.cc shipped discarded units to Adafruit?, to much changes between this one, and the one everyone else got.

@dancombine
Fixed and added, thanks for checking.

New version uploaded.


Rob

Hello Gray,
CANRX and CANTX in the board should be reversed. Great, great job man!

Fixed and uploaded. Thanks.


Rob

Sorry Rob, but you just had only to swap CANTX and CANRX inside the board, as follows:

Sorry again for the misunderstanding.

Bugger, I swapped everything else :slight_smile:

Will fix.

EDIT: Fixed (I hope)


Rob

Good work.

okay1984:
Good work.

I would more than agree with that.

Btw. change the places from PWMH2 and CANTX1 and it looks more corporate