Ethernet shield - webClient example

does that mean you'll leave that .1 stuff in, though?

please, THAT is more the point.

just asking that they remove the 3 and 4 parm versions of the methods. insist that the user supply all 4.

what's wrong with that? it works, its GUARANTEED to work and never has false pos or neg's.

please, solve it right. I'm not asking all that much :wink:

and its NOT a user issue when you 'guess' based on crazy ideas about what people have in their networks. this dot one stuff is just problematic at best. at best.

take it out.