Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2
|
|
1
|
Forum 2005-2010 (read only) / Frequently-Asked Questions / Re: Physical size of commercial electronics?
|
on: May 29, 2010, 10:26:43 pm
|
|
If you can convert your design to a surface mount, the 328 chip can be reduced to a (TQFP_32_ which is smaller than a dime. Mostly whats going to determine the size is things like power and any peripheral component. Do you need usb support? Modern devices has an arduino compatible product called the RBBB that is roughly 2 times in each direction the size of the 328p dip chip.
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
Forum 2005-2010 (read only) / Frequently-Asked Questions / Re: standalone?
|
on: April 15, 2010, 05:27:45 am
|
|
The name of this sub-forum is "Frequently-Asked-Questions", Seems like if one doesn't want to see the same questions over and over again, that they would skip over reading this section. Maybe we need a subforum named, "Questions Rarely Asked"
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
Forum 2005-2010 (read only) / Frequently-Asked Questions / Re: Ubuntu RS-232
|
on: April 03, 2010, 11:51:55 am
|
|
I have 2 boards, and discovered that. I can't upload to one board serially even if I swap 328 chips. Funny thing is that I can upload just fine using the usb adapter. The second board uploads just fine with the P4b serial adapter, and both boards work well with the serial adapter and the arduino serial monitor.
At any rate what I thought was my OS computer system problem turns out to be my board problem .. think my next step is to inspect with a magnifier and an ohm meter. Wierd problem though.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
Forum 2005-2010 (read only) / Frequently-Asked Questions / Ubuntu RS-232
|
on: April 03, 2010, 08:14:26 am
|
|
I have a couple of Arduino RBBB inits and a 6 pin P4b RS232 to ttl adapter. My computer here has a real 9 pin serial connection.. All works fine using the bub usb to 6 pin at /dev/TTYUSB0 but I can't seem to get the port at /dev/ttyS0 to accept an upload. It does do the reset. So I the port seems to be properly connected. I did uninstall ttybrl. Does anyone have any suggestions
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
Forum 2005-2010 (read only) / Frequently-Asked Questions / Re: Magnetic field
|
on: March 17, 2010, 06:04:51 am
|
|
Another old guy here. Used teletypes to talk to the computers. paper tapes to load and boot them up. Have rebuilt more than my share of harddrives to know what a real head crash is. SIngle sided 8 inch floppies were a codewriters salvastion. Fortran was the language of the future and cobal was where the money was, but C was just a letter.
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
Forum 2005-2010 (read only) / Uno Punto Zero / Re: When?
|
on: July 02, 2010, 09:20:04 pm
|
|
Thanks for all the input. My desire to use a 1.0 version is simply to appeal to perception. I have no concerns about the stability of the compiled code. I have an STK500/stk600 and an MKii with Studio 4. If I don't use the bootloader in the final product, I don't have to explain it. At any rate its not important whether 1.0 is released soon. It just effects how I go about releasing this thing.
|
|
|
|
|