Show Posts
|
|
Pages: [1] 2 3
|
|
1
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Long term reliability
|
on: March 25, 2012, 12:53:31 pm
|
|
I understand all of that, my Arduinos have worked at Shuttle launches 2010-11. I had no problems, they were in Pelican cases and well protected. Even with all the forces, the Arduinos were 400 ft from the launch pad, the Duemilanove's worked great. I just looked and I can't get Duemilanove's anymore. No stock. So I will have to go to Uno R3's unless there is something more reliable.
|
|
|
|
|
2
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Long term reliability
|
on: March 25, 2012, 12:14:30 pm
|
|
I am running with RTCs already I am concerned about the Ardino dying. I have them running in inaccessible areas for a year with battery and card changes in cameras about 2-4 weeks. I have heard of mini's passing away after only weeks but I want a smaller footprint and longer battery life so I was thinking of using Sparkfuns Arduino Pro 328s. I have had few problems with the full size boards which I still want to use for some applications but smaller would be an asset.
|
|
|
|
|
3
|
General Category / General Discussion / Long term reliability
|
on: March 24, 2012, 09:39:22 pm
|
|
I am putting together time lapse controllers for long term shooting. I had seen a forum post about reliability of some Arduino boards. Does anyone have experience with the Arduino Pro from Sparkfun? The Minis can be not so great long term from what I hear.
Thx
|
|
|
|
|
5
|
Community / Gigs and Collaborations / Re: How to get camera to record at a certain time
|
on: July 13, 2011, 11:17:39 am
|
|
Well everything! I got the hardware, my issues are with the programming, as I said I don't know a lot but I can make adjustments. Did you take a look at the Control your camera blog post and code? I want to power up the camera and start it recording a minute or so later and the turn off later, although turning off is not necessary since it can just run out of recording space and batteries. Powering up and turning on is the main thing.
Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
8
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Low current Optocoupler
|
on: May 20, 2011, 05:43:15 am
|
|
Transistors and Mosfets don't provide enough isolation. I am running 1 to 4 cameras per controller and focus as well as shutter lines for each camera. Each camera has to be isolated from the other cameras or you get strange interactions and possible feedback of voltage for any of the cameras connected. I have tried it with transistors and not had great results. I have heard lots of good stories about frying of cameras when not properly isolated. Anyway any ideas on low current optoisolators? I have a few more things to try this week.
|
|
|
|
|
9
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Putting all the bits together in a box....
|
on: May 08, 2011, 10:45:32 am
|
|
For "The Last Shuttle Project" I have been using Pelican boxes, 1010, 1020,1040 and so forth. These boxes have a rubber liner so instead of cutting this out I have just used foam to jam the boards into place. It holds them in place pretty well in spite of the forces involved in the launch, a lot of shakin'. Some of our cameras are 500 ft or so from the pad, pretty close!
|
|
|
|
|
10
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Low current Optocoupler
|
on: May 05, 2011, 11:29:22 am
|
|
Well i figured all that out but at this moment all of my camera controllers use optoisolators not relays. I had one prototype with a relay but I am using OKs to keep current down and size small. Just trying to figure the current thing out at the moment. I picked up a couple of 4N33 (OKs with Darlington transistors) yesterday to test and see if I can use them with 1-5mA if so that may be the ticket. I am also going to futz with my current crop of controllers and see if I can reduce the OK current to around 20mA. I have about a dozen at the moment I am using for shooting the space shuttle launch. I also have 4 arduino's I am using as well. I may use more in the future. I really like the fact I can program them for a week or more of launches, the launch time changes every day, so it makes life a bit easier.
|
|
|
|
|
13
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Low current Optocoupler
|
on: May 04, 2011, 03:06:46 pm
|
|
Ok so I was told by another guy that using that level of current was the proper way to go about this but I guess that is wrong as that is the max current. I guess that using the test current would be close to reality as far as current needed to saturate the transistor. I'll build up a test board and do some experimenting.
Thanks, any other ideas or pointers?
|
|
|
|
|
15
|
General Category / General Discussion / Re: Pro Mini current
|
on: May 04, 2011, 12:36:34 pm
|
|
Hmmm, maybe I should see if I can reduce the current to around 20-30mA. I am using a NTE3086 in several of my Deumilanove's at 40mA Total current is output is about 143mA when everything is working. I guess I would also be better off using OKs with higher CTRs. The NTE is only 20% but 4n25s I think are 200-300% so that would be a better choice. Looks like a redesign time for some of them.
|
|
|
|
|