This is not success.
Yes it is, You don't even care about what my real problem was the things you are talking are correct but come along with what I want and not push the ultimate question back as you did.
I will make the code formulated
Btw. while I'm fairly sure the Sparkfun example code is public domain, I think you should still give them some credit if you're essentially using it as-is and then just adding your bits.
Now that you've hacked the Sparkfun example code to high hell to get it to do what you want
Now are you fumed I think you are because Whatever I was able to make it work, What's your problem just keep it at your part.
Talk responsibly don't use aggressive words like hell or whatever you think its fine for you.
I think you should still give them some credit if you're essentially using it as-is and then just adding your bits. Also, the Sparkfun example code isn't all that great to be honest,
Have you seen the code that is with me and it's working? that you are assuming that I'm giving them credit or not? I'll tell, You haven't seen it you are just talking in the air.
Everybodies using libraries we use tonne's of them already while using c/c++/c#/java and I'm not even using any here in my program.
People like you are there to put other's down that's it but remember you don't get up and achieve anything by putting down other's may be its personal gratification for you.
(I'm sorry for you ,your words are all spitting fire and they no longer seem to be there clear things but are there to insert disgust feeling.)
If you "don't have time" to do it right because you are "focusing on some other part of the system" then you certainly don't have time to waste on a slower, more error-prone approach.
@PeterH thank you I will take care or that.