I've seen a few Sanguino sites which indicate the IDE supports those directly now
Backwards compat is critical for people who want to re-use shields of course, but personally I have no use for it.
"it's less confusing if the analog pin indexes match up with the digital ones"I wouldn't think so - A0-A5 as D14-D19 has been the "standard" for quite a while now.
I would find it more confusing, and hurt with backwards compatibilty, if D0/D1 were not the main serial port, if D11-12-13 were not the SPI port, if D18/D19 were not the I2C port, etc.
"Before I decided to upgrade my design tot he 644P or 1284P"Your kickstarter page does not mention that (yet?). You appear to have planned this project out pretty well.The room for larger sketches & SRAM offered is nice. I have used the extra IO offered vs adding another chip or two to a project as well.
Since then I've settled on either the 644 or 1284, but I won't know which I want to go with until I write the code and see if I really need the extra ram.
Option 2 is to do the same thing but store the tokenized code in ram.
SERVO(2) = KNOB(1)
Servo myServo(2);Knob myKnob(1);myServo.isControlledBy(myKnob);
Please enter a valid email to subscribe
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the subscription, please click the link in the
email we just sent you.
Thank you for subscribing!
via Egeo 16