I hadn't read the report at that stage. I was addressing the concern (raised by others) that your post may spur people to illegal activities.
Having read the report now, it doesn't seem to rule in or rule out that the lock hardware has firmware. Considering it uses a 1-wire communications system, stores property keys (presumably in EEPROM) and does crypto, it would be reasonable to assume it has some sort of microprocessor. Given that, presumably it could, with more or less difficulty, be reprogrammed to avoid this flaw.
I don't see that hotels that use this system are a heap worse off than ones that simply issue keys, because keys can be copied. I think a prudent hotel guest would not leave valuables lying around, and would also use the interior bolt when going to sleep.
But it is an interesting demonstration that a high-tech solution is not necessarily secure, and in addition, keeping all the details secret have simply hid how badly designed it is.