Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Author Topic: Precision Resistors (.01% or better) - What are they good for?  (Read 1734 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Show Your Work
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 14
Posts: 1100
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

These resistors go at Digikey for $6.60 qty 1 down to $3.44 qty 1000.  What are these used for in industry?  It seems they would make pretty good precision voltage dividers.  But then again, less precise resistors would make good voltage dividers too if they were measured before going into a product and adjusting somewhere for the actual resistance of the resistor on a per-resistor basis, assuming their stability is good.
Logged

I have only come here seeking knowledge. Things they would not teach me of in college.

Dallas, Texas
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 31
Posts: 887
Old, decrepit curmugeon
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Just as an example, which would be cheaper?  A $3.00 resistor or the labor associated with testing and selecting a large batch of resistors and then 'manually' soldering that resistor to a board. 

When making one?

When making a thousand?

When making a hundred thousand?

You really can't used automated assembly methods with manually selected components...
Logged

New true random number library available at: http://code.google.com/p/avr-hardware-random-number-generation/

Current version 1.0.1

Show Your Work
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 14
Posts: 1100
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Just as an example, which would be cheaper?  A $3.00 resistor or the labor associated with testing and selecting a large batch of resistors and then 'manually' soldering that resistor to a board. 

When making one?

When making a thousand?

When making a hundred thousand?

You really can't used automated assembly methods with manually selected components...

Here probably the part.

In China, probably the labor.

Just a gesss.  I bet you can test the parts at a workbench and bin them prior to soldering, assuming soldering doesn't change the value.  The saving would add up very quickly at $3 a part saved if you are doing thousands.  I guess it depends on the scale and what kinds of products actually need this precision.  If it's only 6.5 digit DMMs then I agree with you, the quantites will just never be that high.
Logged

I have only come here seeking knowledge. Things they would not teach me of in college.

California
Offline Offline
Faraday Member
**
Karma: 88
Posts: 3383
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

I guess it depends on the scale and what kinds of products actually need this precision.
My first thought would be medical instruments.
Logged

Dallas, Texas
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 31
Posts: 887
Old, decrepit curmugeon
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Here probably the part.

In China, probably the labor.

Doubtful, either would be more cost effective.  Lower labor costs would yield lower product/distribution costs for the resistors, so that $3 resistor in the US may be a small fraction of that in China.  Evidence that this is the case, is that China still uses automated manufacturing for electronics...

Just a gesss.  I bet you can test the parts at a workbench and bin them prior to soldering, assuming soldering doesn't change the value.  The saving would add up very quickly at $3 a part saved if you are doing thousands. 

I believe your assumptions are faulty.  One, I don't think you appreciate how much human labor costs, even in places like China.  Cheap electronics exist because they can be assembled mostly/completely in an automated fashion.

Two, you can almost certainly not manually bin the parts for automated assembly.  Indeed that is one ways hobbyists get cheap smd parts, leftovers from those large spools used in automated assembly.  If it was cost effective, they would be reused.

I guess it depends on the scale and what kinds of products actually need this precision.  If it's only 6.5 digit DMMs then I agree with you, the quantites will just never be that high.

Well, the demands for those itens are almost certainly reasonably high, since they can be purchased via non-specialized dealers like Digikey.  They wouldn't be getting manufactured unless there was sufficient demand.  And most likely you need them even in devices with relatively high error rates.  The issue arises from cumulative error, which is almost always higher then (and can be much higher) than the error margins on the individual components.
Logged

New true random number library available at: http://code.google.com/p/avr-hardware-random-number-generation/

Current version 1.0.1

0
Offline Offline
Faraday Member
**
Karma: 24
Posts: 3488
20 LEDs are enough
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Quote
But then again, less precise resistors would make good voltage dividers too if they were measured before going into a product and adjusting somewhere for the actual resistance of the resistor on a per-resistor basis, assuming their stability is good.

You already have the answer in your question. The less precise resistors have no guaranteed stability. Usually the precision is guaranteed for some temperature range. This is the reason why the more precise resistors are more expensive. They are manufactured differently to produce the better precision.
Logged

Check out my experiments http://blog.blinkenlight.net

Show Your Work
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 14
Posts: 1100
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

  Evidence that this is the case, is that China still uses automated manufacturing for electronics...
Cheap electronics exist because they can be assembled mostly/completely in an automated fashion.

FoxConn alone employs 1.2 million people, almost all of them in assembly.  I guess they are paid to watch the machines.
Logged

I have only come here seeking knowledge. Things they would not teach me of in college.

Dallas, Texas
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 31
Posts: 887
Old, decrepit curmugeon
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

  Evidence that this is the case, is that China still uses automated manufacturing for electronics...
Cheap electronics exist because they can be assembled mostly/completely in an automated fashion.

FoxConn alone employs 1.2 million people, almost all of them in assembly.  I guess they are paid to watch the machines.

No, I would guess that they are paid, among other things to assemble boards into products... and for testing, moving boxes, etc... Can you find a manufacturer of large quantities that produce electronics boards by hand?
Logged

New true random number library available at: http://code.google.com/p/avr-hardware-random-number-generation/

Current version 1.0.1

Show Your Work
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 14
Posts: 1100
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

 Evidence that this is the case, is that China still uses automated manufacturing for electronics...
Cheap electronics exist because they can be assembled mostly/completely in an automated fashion.

FoxConn alone employs 1.2 million people, almost all of them in assembly.  I guess they are paid to watch the machines.

No, I would guess that they are paid, among other things to assemble boards into products... and for testing, moving boxes, etc... Can you find a manufacturer of large quantities that produce electronics boards by hand?

Surface mount, no.  But I remember this video:



7:20 employees hand-mounting the through-hole components.  At least I think that is where it is, I don't have audio here.

It still seems to me that if you wanted to pinch pennies you could use lower cost resistors if the stability was guaranteed.  Another reply seems to indicate that it is not.  It certainly wouldn't be with carbon film resistors, but metal film ones I would think would be very stable.

Remember Rigol overclocked (maybe still does) ADCs on their lower-end scopes and it worked just fine.  It's not beyond Chinese companies to push the specs.

Anyway, this was not the main point of my post.  I was wondering what the application of .01% resistors is.  So far I have medical devices, maybe.
Logged

I have only come here seeking knowledge. Things they would not teach me of in college.

Left Coast, CA (USA)
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 361
Posts: 17294
Measurement changes behavior
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

There is certainly applications for high precision components in industry. In the oil and gas chemical plant industry we would usually see 250 ohm precision (.1%, .05%, etc) resistors used in the instrumentation measurement equipment where the standard 4-20ma current loops from the field would be converted to 1-5vdc before they did a A/D conversion for the process control systems. Also some test equipment would use such high precision ratings.

Picking up a few such high tolerance resistors and caps (say from e-bay surplus sellers) can be very useful for hobbyist as 'lab standards' for checking the accuracy of your test equipment.

Lefty
Logged

Show Your Work
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 14
Posts: 1100
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Picking up a few such high tolerance resistors and caps (say from e-bay surplus sellers) can be very useful for hobbyist as 'lab standards' for checking the accuracy of your test equipment.

Lefty

I came to that conclusion too.  The whole thing that started this line of thought in my head was seeing a few eBay listings with these precision resistors.  I picked up a few.  I want to see if they are really within spec or not. 
Logged

I have only come here seeking knowledge. Things they would not teach me of in college.

SW Scotland
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 17
Posts: 1391
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset


[/quote]

I came to that conclusion too.  The whole thing that started this line of thought in my head was seeing a few eBay listings with these precision resistors.  I picked up a few.  I want to see if they are really within spec or not. 
[/quote]

And how do you propose to do that  -  by measuring something supposed to be within 0.05% tolerance with a pice of test kit that MIGHT (at best) be within 1%  -  a difference of 20:1
Logged

Dallas, Texas
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 31
Posts: 887
Old, decrepit curmugeon
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Two examples come to mind.

DC to DC converters.  Most of the circuits I have seen (which I will admit aren't many) specced high precision (<1%) components for portions of the circuit.

Shunt resistors.  Typically very small values, which imply higher precision.  But futher, the voltage across the resistor will usually get amplified.  So a 0.05% shunt resistor that gets an amplification of 20 for the voltage differential will produce a +/- 1% precision (0.05% * 20)... consider what a 1% or 5% resistor would do if they were even available in the values needed.

And higher precision components, due to their higher costs, tend to be manufactured to better quality.
Logged

New true random number library available at: http://code.google.com/p/avr-hardware-random-number-generation/

Current version 1.0.1

Left Coast, CA (USA)
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 361
Posts: 17294
Measurement changes behavior
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Quote
author=jackrae link=topic=119797.msg901821#msg901821 date=1345743610]


I came to that conclusion too.  The whole thing that started this line of thought in my head was seeing a few eBay listings with these precision resistors.  I picked up a few.  I want to see if they are really within spec or not.  


And how do you propose to do that  -  by measuring something supposed to be within 0.05% tolerance with a pice of test kit that MIGHT (at best) be within 1%  -  a difference of 20:1

I was going to bring up the same point. The rule of thumb in instrumentation standards, calibration, validations, and check out is that your test equipment should have X10 the tolerance specifications of the things you wish to measure. So validating a resistor with a .01% tolerance would take a measurement meter capable of .001% accuracy. What these components offer to a hobbyist is a way to tell if their test equipment is operating up to specs, not the ability to validate the specification of the component.

Lefty
Logged

Show Your Work
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 14
Posts: 1100
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

And how do you propose to do that  -  by measuring something supposed to be within 0.05% tolerance with a pice of test kit that MIGHT (at best) be within 1%  -  a difference of 20:1

I am going to measure them with a 34410A.  Maybe your test kit is 1%.
« Last Edit: August 23, 2012, 01:21:11 pm by JoeN » Logged

I have only come here seeking knowledge. Things they would not teach me of in college.

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Jump to: