Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Down
Author Topic: DAC support  (Read 13922 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Hamburg, Germany
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 3
Posts: 3
member of Attraktor e.V. in Hamburg, Germany
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Hey there,

I tried the DACC on the Arduino Due, but it doesn't work as expected. I used the function analogWrite() for setting a new DAC value. The following code will work as expected:

Code:
byte value;
void loop() {
  analogWrite(DAC0, value++);
}

Same applies if you replace DAC0 with DAC1. For some unknown reason, I couldn't get both DACs to work simultaneously. The following code does not work:

Code:
byte value;
void loop() {
  analogWrite(DAC0, value++);
  analogWrite(DAC1, value * 2);
}

I think it has something to do with the code in hardware/arduino/sam/cores/arduino/wiring_analog.c. In the function analogWrite() there is the following lines:

Code:
// Write user value
 ulValue = mapResolution(ulValue, _writeResolution, DACC_RESOLUTION);
 dacc_write_conversion_data(DACC_INTERFACE, ulValue);

I'm missing the channel selection before writing conversion data. Did someone else use the DACs before with analogWrite()? Is the reported behaviour bug or feature?

mfg, Stefan.
Logged

--
member of Attraktor e.V. in Hamburg, Germany
the largest makerspace in northern Germany
come in and join us

Forum Administrator
Milano, Italy
Offline Offline
Sr. Member
*****
Karma: 23
Posts: 292
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

smay4finger,

I fear that you're right, the analogWrite on DACs didn't work if you write on both DACs.
I don't know why, but seems that nobody (including me) ever dreamed to test BOTH channels together.

I'll put the fix to this in the to-do list, before the next beta release 1.5.1 (that is very close).

C
Logged

C.

Hamburg, Germany
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 3
Posts: 3
member of Attraktor e.V. in Hamburg, Germany
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Fix was trivial. Please find attached the patch for wiring_analog.c. Should I make bug report?

mfg, Stefan.

* wiring_analog.c (9.62 KB - downloaded 186 times.)
* patch (1.65 KB - downloaded 115 times.)
« Last Edit: November 01, 2012, 01:22:29 pm by smay4finger » Logged

--
member of Attraktor e.V. in Hamburg, Germany
the largest makerspace in northern Germany
come in and join us

Forum Administrator
Milano, Italy
Offline Offline
Sr. Member
*****
Karma: 23
Posts: 292
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

smay4finger,

thank for the patch I'm testing it in the next hours, in case may you open a pull request on github so i can merge it?

C
Logged

C.

Global Moderator
Milano, Italy
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*****
Karma: 19
Posts: 1175
Arduino rocks
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Hi,
I tested your patch and I think it works!

I attach a sketch that generates a sine wave on both the DAC outputs phase shifted of pi. To prove I add  the screen capture of the oscilloscope.

+1 Karma is deserved smiley

* DAC_Sine_Due.ino (2.63 KB - downloaded 131 times.)

* DS0003.BMP (16.56 KB, 320x234 - viewed 325 times.)
Logged

F

Hamburg, Germany
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 3
Posts: 3
member of Attraktor e.V. in Hamburg, Germany
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

I made a bug report here: http://code.google.com/p/arduino/issues/detail?id=1092

Please use the patch attached to the ticket. There is also a bugfix regarding corruption of the data register, when writing too fast.
Logged

--
member of Attraktor e.V. in Hamburg, Germany
the largest makerspace in northern Germany
come in and join us

Forum Administrator
Milano, Italy
Offline Offline
Sr. Member
*****
Karma: 23
Posts: 292
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Done, thank you.

C
Logged

C.

Freiburg, Germany
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 2
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset



"I tried the DACC on the Arduino Due, but it doesn't work as expected. I used the function analogWrite() for setting a new DAC value. The following code will work as expected:"

Code:
byte value;
void loop() {
  analogWrite(DAC0, value++);
}

Hello, when i test the DAC on the DUE i measured an Outputvoltage from 0,55V (value 0) to 2,77V (value 255). I thought the DAC has a range from 0V to 3,3V?! Do anybody knows more or can help me?

greets
parasound
Logged

Basel
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 3
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

"Hello, when i test the DAC on the DUE i measured an Outputvoltage from 0,55V (value 0) to 2,77V (value 255). I thought the DAC has a range from 0V to 3,3V?! Do anybody knows more or can help me?"

Hi all!
I would be interested in this too. Could not figure out yet why DAC range ist approx. 0,54V - 2.74V (both channels).
andy_G
Logged

Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 1
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Hi parasound and andy_g,

I could find no information about the DAC range in the SAM3X datasheet.
But on page 1059 of SAM3S datasheet, it is said that the voltage range of the DAC is from (1/6) x VADVREF to (5/6) x VADVREF.
So I suspect, the same applies to SAM3U, and range is 1/6 x 3.3V = 0.55V to 5/6 x 3.3V = 2.75V, which is verified by your measures.

wibauxl
Logged

Freiburg, Germany
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 2
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Ok.
Thank you wibauxl.
Logged

Left Coast, CA (USA)
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 361
Posts: 17294
Measurement changes behavior
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Hi parasound and andy_g,

I could find no information about the DAC range in the SAM3X datasheet.
But on page 1059 of SAM3S datasheet, it is said that the voltage range of the DAC is from (1/6) x VADVREF to (5/6) x VADVREF.
So I suspect, the same applies to SAM3U, and range is 1/6 x 3.3V = 0.55V to 5/6 x 3.3V = 2.75V, which is verified by your measures.

wibauxl

That seems pretty limiting. You mean one can't measure output signals between below .55 volt? There must be more to the subject then that?

Lefty
« Last Edit: November 12, 2012, 10:24:55 am by retrolefty » Logged

Forum Administrator
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 52
Posts: 646
I find plain exciting
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

@retrolefty

We're talking about the DAC here. The ADC works at voltages below 0.55v.
As far as the DAC is concerned it's a pity to have such limits but I guess for audio applications there are way to circumvent the issue.

m
Logged

Left Coast, CA (USA)
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 361
Posts: 17294
Measurement changes behavior
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

@retrolefty

We're talking about the DAC here. The ADC works at voltages below 0.55v.
As far as the DAC is concerned it's a pity to have such limits but I guess for audio applications there are way to circumvent the issue.

m

Well I don't yet own a Due and not up to the task just yet of taking on the huge datasheet for this uP, but they must talk about this range restriction if indeed it's a hardware based restriction. I just find it very hard to except at this time that there is a legitimate reason for this. I guess it could be compensated for with external op-amp with a -.55v offset, but still there just must be more to this subject then 'that's just the way it is'? It's really not a problem for audio type applications as one could just capacitance couple the signal, but for precision DC DAC applications, not being able to reach ground potential is a pretty big deal, no?

Lefty
« Last Edit: November 12, 2012, 10:34:51 am by retrolefty » Logged

Basel
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 3
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

...what would also make sense resolution-wise: LSB seems to be 0.5mV (measured) which is in line with wibauxl's theory ((2.75-0.55)/4096=0.537mV). This DAC behaviour -and te lack of it's documentation- is a little odd to my opinion, but at least there's an explanation that makes sense.

MANY THANKS FOR ALL YOUR INPUTS!!

andy_g
Logged

Pages: [1] 2 3   Go Up
Jump to: