Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 3
|
 |
« on: November 10, 2012, 09:46:13 am » |
Hi,
I have in project to build a thermal-IR camera. I know there's already a arduino project to build something like this. What i want is something more in the range of a video camera with thermal-IR, not something that has to scan a area to make a thermal image. I want to it be live. I want to use this to go into the woods and see wildlife.
I was think of using the MLX90620 sensor. I don't know if this is possible. Any input from you guys would be appreciated.
Thanks alot.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
UK
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 137
Posts: 19047
I don't think you connected the grounds, Dave.
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 10, 2012, 11:54:40 am » |
You're going to have to build some kind of scanning mechanism. (TICM is a useful search term) How are your precision mechanics skills?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.
|
|
|
|
Manchester (England England)
Offline
Brattain Member
Karma: 277
Posts: 25497
Solder is electric glue
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2012, 12:32:07 pm » |
I was think of using the MLX90620 sensor. It is not just a matter of wiring up the sensor to get a 16 by 4 pixel image. You have to focus an image onto the sensor. For that you need a lens that works at far IR. That means a germanium or silicon lens and that means big $. A lot of money for a very small image.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
UK
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 137
Posts: 19047
I don't think you connected the grounds, Dave.
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 10, 2012, 12:46:03 pm » |
That device is almost certainly a staring array, not mechanically scanned. It clearly isn't impossible though, because you can buy one. It is probably also near-IR.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 3
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 10, 2012, 12:48:27 pm » |
Hi,
Thanks for your inputs. I know i could buy one, but i'm going to have more fun building one.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
UK
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 137
Posts: 19047
I don't think you connected the grounds, Dave.
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 10, 2012, 12:54:30 pm » |
As Mike said, the optics are exotic (most common glass is opaque/reflective to the sorts of wavelengths you're interested in - find some thermal footage on YouTube and try looking into cars) and a 16 x 4 image by itself is very limited, so the scanning mechanism is essential.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.
|
|
|
|
Manchester (England England)
Offline
Brattain Member
Karma: 277
Posts: 25497
Solder is electric glue
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 10, 2012, 01:14:56 pm » |
It says:- Employing either a 320 × 240 or 640 × 480 FLIR thermal imaging core with advanced image-processing algorithms,
So an arduino with a 320 X 240 image will need 76.8K bytes, how is this going to fit into the 2K SDRM? So building something like that with an arduino is impossible.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
UK
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 137
Posts: 19047
I don't think you connected the grounds, Dave.
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 10, 2012, 01:20:32 pm » |
I was assuming that you'd be reading and sending a row (or even a pixel) at a time, not as an entire image. However, there remains the problem of digitising at video rates. This really ins't Arduino territory, unless you're only using it to drive the scanning mechanism.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.
|
|
|
|
Offline
Edison Member
Karma: 4
Posts: 1131
If you're not living on the Edge, you're taking up too much space!
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 10, 2012, 08:54:04 pm » |
I bought an excellent IR hunters camera that only takes 2ma while sensing, and costs $100. You can't build that for less!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
If you fall... I'll be there for you! -Floor
Skype Brighteyes3333 (262) 696-9619
|
|
|
|
|