Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 16
|
 |
« on: November 11, 2012, 01:09:55 pm » |
Hi this I have made an arduino line follower. using An arduino dumilave. A 5 ir sensor array. A 12v and 850ma battery and 300 rpm motors.I am unable to find Kp Ki Kd values and my robot is not at all following the line. This is my code. Pls some one help const int motor3Pin = 3; const int motor1Pin = 10; const int motor2Pin = 6; const int motor4Pin = 11; int right_speed = 0; int left_speed = 0; long sensors[] = {0,0,0,0,0}; long sensors_average = 0; int sensors_sum = 0; int posn; //position int proportional = 0; long integral = 0; int derivative = 0; int last_proportional = 0; float Kp = 2; // Havent decided the values yet float Ki = 2; float Kd = 2; int error_value = 0; int max_speed = 200; int set_point = 1987;//the posn on the center of line, I have to decide the value yet
void setup(){ pinMode(motor1Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor2Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor3Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor4Pin, OUTPUT); Serial.begin(9600); }
void read_sensors () { for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { sensors = analogRead(i); sensors_average += sensors * i * 1000; sensors_sum += int(sensors); } }
void pid_calc () { posn = int(sensors_average / sensors_sum); proportional = posn - set_point; integral = integral + proportional; derivative = proportional - last_proportional; last_proportional = proportional; error_value = int(proportional * Kp + integral * Ki + derivative * Kd); }
void calc_turn(){ if (error_value < -256) { error_value = -256; } if (error_value > 256) { error_value = 256; } if (error_value < 0) { right_speed = max_speed + error_value; left_speed = max_speed; } else { right_speed = max_speed; left_speed = max_speed + error_value; } }
void motor_drive (int right_speed, int left_speed) { analogWrite(motor1Pin, right_speed); analogWrite(motor2Pin, left_speed); delay(20); }
void loop () { read_sensors (); pid_calc (); calc_turn (); motor_drive (right_speed, left_speed); Serial.print(error_value); Serial.print(" "); Serial.print(right_speed); Serial.print(" "); Serial.print(left_speed); Serial.println(" "); }
Thanx
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle, WA USA
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 311
Posts: 35476
Seattle, WA USA
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: November 11, 2012, 01:59:58 pm » |
my robot is not at all following the line. Do you KNOW that the robot is reading the sensors correctly? Reading the 5 sensors, adding up the values, and determining an average will tell you nothing about where the line is. I think you are barking up the wrong tree. As a matter of fact, I don't think you are even barking in the right forest.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Offline
Edison Member
Karma: 26
Posts: 1339
You do some programming to solve a problem, and some to solve it in a particular language. (CC2)
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: November 11, 2012, 03:07:12 pm » |
Writing a PID algorithm is not the easiest of the jobs. Please have a look at the PID library, and learn to use and tune it. http://brettbeauregard.com/blog/2011/04/improving-the-beginners-pid-direction/
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle, WA USA
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 311
Posts: 35476
Seattle, WA USA
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: November 11, 2012, 03:11:47 pm » |
Please have a look at the PID library, and learn to use and tune it. Good advice - IF you have any kind of good data to drive the PID algorithm.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Offline
Edison Member
Karma: 26
Posts: 1339
You do some programming to solve a problem, and some to solve it in a particular language. (CC2)
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: November 11, 2012, 03:13:48 pm » |
Well, a good advice could have been also "are you _sure_ you need a PID ?".  What made me jump to that (bookmarked) page, though, was that pid_calc() function...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
the land of sun+snow
Offline
Edison Member
Karma: 80
Posts: 2117
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: November 11, 2012, 05:00:41 pm » |
Seems to me there must have been 10,000 roboticists who have made line-following robots that never even heard the term PID. Why not try doing it the simple way [differential sensor readings] FIRST, like everyone else.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 16
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: November 12, 2012, 03:17:36 am » |
Hey my senors are reading correctly and i can differentiate between the set point and other positions. I have built line followers first and they were successful. Now i want to make a high speed and accurate line follower so i have chosen the pid algorithm.
Thanx for ur help the link was useful
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
UK
Offline
Brattain Member
Karma: 137
Posts: 19019
I don't think you connected the grounds, Dave.
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: November 12, 2012, 03:23:12 am » |
OP: could you repost your code please, not using "format for forum" (or whatever it is called), but simply copying the contents of your IDE window, and pasting the result between [code] [/code] tags? That way, we'll avoid the nonsense of void read_sensors () { for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { sensors = analogRead(i); sensors_average += sensors * i * 1000; sensors_sum += int(sensors); } }
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 16
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: November 12, 2012, 04:33:22 am » |
const int motor3Pin = 3; const int motor1Pin = 10; const int motor2Pin = 6; const int motor4Pin = 11; int right_speed = 0; int left_speed = 0; long sensors[] = {0,0,0,0,0}; long sensors_average = 0; int sensors_sum = 0; int posn; //position int proportional = 0; long integral = 0; int derivative = 0; int last_proportional = 0; float Kp = 2; // Havent decided the values yet float Ki = 2; float Kd = 2; int error_value = 0; int max_speed = 200; int set_point = 1987;//the posn on the center of line, I have to decide the value yet
void setup(){ pinMode(motor1Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor2Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor3Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor4Pin, OUTPUT); Serial.begin(9600); }
void read_sensors () { for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { sensors = analogRead(i); sensors_average += sensors * i * 1000; sensors_sum += int(sensors); } }
void pid_calc () { posn = int(sensors_average / sensors_sum); proportional = posn - set_point; integral = integral + proportional; derivative = proportional - last_proportional; last_proportional = proportional; error_value = int(proportional * Kp + integral * Ki + derivative * Kd); }
void calc_turn(){ if (error_value < -256) { error_value = -256; } if (error_value > 256) { error_value = 256; } if (error_value < 0) { right_speed = max_speed + error_value; left_speed = max_speed; } else { right_speed = max_speed; left_speed = max_speed + error_value; } }
void motor_drive (int right_speed, int left_speed) { analogWrite(motor1Pin, right_speed); analogWrite(motor2Pin, left_speed); delay(20); }
void loop () { read_sensors (); pid_calc (); calc_turn (); motor_drive (right_speed, left_speed); Serial.print(error_value); Serial.print(" "); Serial.print(right_speed); Serial.print(" "); Serial.print(left_speed); Serial.println(" "); }
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle, WA USA
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 311
Posts: 35476
Seattle, WA USA
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: November 12, 2012, 04:38:30 am » |
void read_sensors () { for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { sensors = analogRead(i); sensors_average += sensors * i * 1000; sensors_sum += int(sensors); } } Well, that's certainly a lot better. Since OP can't seem to follow simple directions, it's no real wonder why the robot can't follow a line.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
UK
Offline
Brattain Member
Karma: 137
Posts: 19019
I don't think you connected the grounds, Dave.
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: November 12, 2012, 04:47:54 am » |
OP. Please look at your source code. Does it contain italics?
No, I thought not.
Please use [code] [/code] tags when posting code - you can either type them, or use the # icon on the editor's toolbar.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Pete, it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart.
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 16
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: November 18, 2012, 01:20:04 am » |
const int motor3Pin = 3; const int motor1Pin = 10; const int motor2Pin = 6; const int motor4Pin = 11; int right_speed = 0; int left_speed = 0; long sensors[] = {0,0,0,0,0}; long sensors_average = 0; int sensors_sum = 0; int posn; //position int proportional = 0; long integral = 0; int derivative = 0; int last_proportional = 0; float Kp = 2; // Havent decided the values yet float Ki = 2; float Kd = 2; int error_value = 0; int max_speed = 200; int set_point = 1987;//the posn on the center of line, I have to decide the value yet
void setup(){ pinMode(motor1Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor2Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor3Pin, OUTPUT); pinMode(motor4Pin, OUTPUT); Serial.begin(9600); }
void read_sensors () { for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) { sensors[i] = analogRead(i); sensors_average += sensors[i] * i * 1000; sensors_sum += int(sensors[i]); } }
void pid_calc () { posn = int(sensors_average / sensors_sum); proportional = posn - set_point; integral = integral + proportional; derivative = proportional - last_proportional; last_proportional = proportional; error_value = int(proportional * Kp + integral * Ki + derivative * Kd); }
void calc_turn(){ if (error_value < -256) { error_value = -256; } if (error_value > 256) { error_value = 256; } if (error_value < 0) { right_speed = max_speed + error_value; left_speed = max_speed; } else { right_speed = max_speed; left_speed = max_speed + error_value; } }
void motor_drive (int right_speed, int left_speed) { analogWrite(motor1Pin, right_speed); analogWrite(motor2Pin, left_speed); delay(20); }
void loop () { read_sensors (); pid_calc (); calc_turn (); motor_drive (right_speed, left_speed); Serial.print(error_value); Serial.print(" "); Serial.print(right_speed); Serial.print(" "); Serial.print(left_speed); Serial.println(" "); }
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
UK
Offline
Tesla Member
Karma: 89
Posts: 6340
-
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: November 18, 2012, 09:19:48 am » |
The plus here should probably be a minus: left_speed = max_speed + error_value;
Is your calculation of posn returning sensible values based on what is in front of your sensors? I guess you're trying to calculate where the 'hot spot' is. You don't seem to be providing any control over the timing of your PID algorithm. The derivative and integral elements are with respect to time, and I don't see anything to provide a consistent sample rate. Is there some reason you aren't just using the PID library?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|