Australia
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 8
Posts: 326
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« on: December 02, 2012, 06:13:16 pm » |
I want to switch a 0.33 kW 415VAC three phase motor and also monitor the individual phases. (Yes, I know the dangers - to myself but not necessarily to the Arduino with low voltage inductive spikes etc. I frequently work with 415VAC 3 phase.) I thought that I could use this setup for each phase with the three respective signal pins connected to the one arduino output pin.  Would this work? With the three control circuits coming into the one signal pin, could there be a crosstalk or any other issues? Secondly, I would like to stop the motor if one of the phases dropped out through loss of power or failure of one of the triacs. How could I safely monitor the voltage on each phase? I do not want to use relays.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 02, 2012, 06:33:01 pm by lemming »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SW Scotland
Offline
Edison Member
Karma: 7
Posts: 1069
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: December 03, 2012, 03:57:37 am » |
Assuming you use a 3-phase direct on-line contactor as your "isolating" device (ideal for incorporation of the emergency STOP facility) this will/should have "lost-phase" detection due to out-of-balance current sensing via its in-built thermal trips.
Out of interest, why would you want to vary the voltage on a 3-phase motor - as the suggested circuit is intended to do, or are you simply switching it ON and Off. If so why not simply drive the contactor. Yes I know you say you don't want relays, why not !
If it's variable speed you desire then you need to vary the frequency of the drive power and simply chopping the 50Hz mains via triac control will not achieve this.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 03, 2012, 05:13:17 am by jackrae »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 8
Posts: 326
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: December 03, 2012, 07:35:35 am » |
Assuming you use a 3-phase direct on-line contactor .... I am trying to get away from mechanical components. I find that they are usually the problem in systems controlling AC motors. Either mechnical wear/breakdown or burnt out contacts from arcing is the common cause of failure. Out of interest, why would you want to vary the voltage on a 3-phase motor I will be using a digital pin from the Arduino so the motor will be either full on or full off.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 146
Posts: 4906
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: December 03, 2012, 07:27:40 pm » |
I suggest you consider using ready-made SSRs rather than roll your own with opto triacs and power triacs. You can even buy 3-phase SSRs, see e.g. http://www.crydom.com/en/Tech/3P_MC_whitepaper.pdf.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 146
Posts: 4906
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: December 03, 2012, 07:55:03 pm » |
PS - also see the bit in the paper I linked to which explains why you should NOT use zero-crossing SSRs with 3-phase induction motors.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
Australia
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 8
Posts: 326
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: December 04, 2012, 06:48:52 am » |
I suggest you consider using ready-made SSRs rather than roll your own with opto triacs and power triacs. The three phase units cost over $200. A few opto-isolators, triacs, etc cost around $20. I have an application that may need 6 - 8 of these. That few hundred dollars is a fair premium to pay for the SSRs. PS - also see the bit in the paper I linked to which explains why you should NOT use zero-crossing SSRs with 3-phase induction motors. Thanks for the heads up. I will look at using non zero crossing units. Still don't know how to safely monitor that each phase is active.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Australia
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 8
Posts: 326
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: December 05, 2012, 06:13:27 am » |
Thanks dc42. We have 415VAC here in Australia so that unit won't do but I will have a look for similar units.
Regarding the voltage monitoring; just checking that I've got it right.
The AC voltage connects to the resistor (lowering the current but maintaining the high voltage) and then into the rectifier (which has to be a high voltage unit). The voltage comes out of the rectifier as 240vDC (or slightly greater). Would it matter if the resistor was after the rectifier?
I can only find opto-isolators that take a low voltage to the diode and switch to a high voltage. What I need here, is the reverse: An opto-isolator where the high voltage feeds the diode which is switching the low voltage.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 146
Posts: 4906
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: December 05, 2012, 08:04:32 am » |
The rectifier does not need to be a high voltage unit provided that the resistor comes before the rectifier, you use a bridge rectifier (not a single diode), and the opto isolator has been connected. The diode in the optoisolator effectively shorts the output of the bridge rectifier, so that the voltage appearing across the rectifier is constrained to a few volts.
If the opto isolator diode goes open circuit, then the rectifier does see the full mains voltage and a low voltage rectifier will suffer avalanche breakdown. But the current will still be limited by the resistor, so this is safe. However, 800V bridge rectifiers are inexpensive, so get a high voltage one if you like.
The resistor needs to be rated at 415VAC (resistors have voltage ratings as well as power ratings), and it will dissipate a fair amount of power. For example, if you use 200K (giving about 2mA RMS current, 3mA peak), then it will dissipate just over 0.8W. You might want to use two 100K 1W resistors in series, to help spread the power dissipation and to allow use of a lower voltage rating.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
Australia
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 8
Posts: 326
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: December 05, 2012, 04:19:59 pm » |
Thanks dc42. I'm getting there! The resistor needs to be rated at 415VAC As I'm putting one of these on each phase, does this only have to be 240VAC? (It doesn't hurt to have overkill but just getting the theory right in my mind).
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 146
Posts: 4906
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: December 06, 2012, 07:10:29 am » |
If you are monitoring the voltage between each live and the common neutral, then 240V AC rating (350V DC) will be sufficient in theory. However, to allow for transients, I suggest you use two 350V resistors in series. Something like 2 x 56K 0.5W 350V metal film.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
|