Offline
Edison Member
Karma: 114
Posts: 2205
|
 |
« Reply #15 on: December 09, 2012, 08:43:15 pm » |
The comparator(and C10) is essentially there No. Where should the µC know C from? The meter you are trying to build does not measure ESR: it provides an indication of ESR, in conjunction with a known C. Anyhow, can I improve my software solution or do I require two interrupts, without changes to the way the measurement is done? Yes. This would be what I would do: 1) measure the voltage on the capacitor, V0; 2) charge up the capacitor for a known period of time, Tc; 3) measure the voltage on the capacitor, V1; C = (V1-V0) / (I * Tc); 4) discharge the capacitor for a known period of time, Td; 5) measure the voltage, V2: V2 = V1 * exp (-Td / (ESR * C)), solve for ESR. Done. It uses the same hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: December 09, 2012, 09:02:52 pm » |
Somehow I knew that I shouldn't have said what I'm building because there is always someone who just wants to argue instead of helping someone. Btw, the Meter has been sold tens on thousands of times (as a kit and prebuild) and is still being sold, so the method of "indication" can't be too wrong.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Melbourne, Australia
Offline
Shannon Member
Karma: 218
Posts: 13896
Lua rocks!
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: December 09, 2012, 10:46:34 pm » |
Somewhere I heard, that interrupts aren't allowed within interrupts. Is that true? If the Arduino "remembers" that there was another(different) interrupt during the timer interrupt and executes it afterwards, that would be fine ...
It wouldn't work very well if it could only handle one interrupt source at a time. Yes it will remember interrupt events. The ISR will not be entered until the current one completes, and one more instruction is executed. Then the highest priority outstanding interrupt (if any) will be serviced. http://www.gammon.com.au/interrupts
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: December 10, 2012, 04:05:53 am » |
Somewhere I heard, that interrupts aren't allowed within interrupts. Is that true? If the Arduino "remembers" that there was another(different) interrupt during the timer interrupt and executes it afterwards, that would be fine ...
It wouldn't work very well if it could only handle one interrupt source at a time. Yes it will remember interrupt events. The ISR will not be entered until the current one completes, and one more instruction is executed. Then the highest priority outstanding interrupt (if any) will be serviced. http://www.gammon.com.au/interruptsThanks!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: December 11, 2012, 04:34:52 am » |
I have another question on timing inside an interrupt. Currently a bitWrite(PORTD, measurementRange, 0);
is just called multiple times inside a timer interrupt to make a pulse with a width of somewhere between 4µs and 15µs(adjustable) because i read here http://jeelabs.org/2010/01/06/pin-io-performance/ that it takes about 1µs to execute a bitWrite(). Is there a better way for such short timings? It doesn't have to be that precise, just the same amount of delay every time once it's set.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Online
Faraday Member
Karma: 131
Posts: 4656
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: December 11, 2012, 05:28:22 am » |
You could call delayMicroseconds instead, but I'm not sure what the minimum delay you can get with it is.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: December 11, 2012, 06:09:26 am » |
You could call delayMicroseconds instead, but I'm not sure what the minimum delay you can get with it is.
On the Arduino website, it says around 3µs. But can I call it inside a timer interrupt? This function works very accurately in the range 3 microseconds and up. We cannot assure that delayMicroseconds will perform precisely for smaller delay-times.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 11, 2012, 06:13:14 am by daywalkerdha »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Online
Faraday Member
Karma: 131
Posts: 4656
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: December 11, 2012, 06:51:51 am » |
Yes, you can call it inside an ISR. However, inside an ISR you should use it only for short delays, because you are lengthening the time it takes to complete the ISR and hence the time before other interrupts can be serviced.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 11, 2012, 07:11:30 am by dc42 »
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: December 11, 2012, 06:59:54 am » |
Yes, you can call it inside an ISR. However, inside an ISR you should use it only for short delays, because you are lengthening the tie it takes to complete the ISR and hence the time before other interrupts can be serviced.
Ok, thanks! The interrupt will be executed every 500µs and inside it will only be one delayMicroseconds() of around 10µs and the whole routine should take no longer than 15µs, including the delay.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Melbourne, Australia
Offline
Shannon Member
Karma: 218
Posts: 13896
Lua rocks!
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: December 11, 2012, 03:21:50 pm » |
You can do the whole thing with PWM. In my project of making VGA output I needed both vertical and horizontal sync pulses. It sounds similar to what you are doing. You need the pulses a certain width apart, and with a short pulse time. Project page: http://www.gammon.com.au/forum/?id=11608Example screenshot:  In that case I had a 4 uS pulse with a 32 uS period. Those figures can be changed by the timer configuration values. This doesn't rely on ISRs at all (for the pulses) since the timer does that.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 45
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: December 12, 2012, 05:38:17 am » |
You can do the whole thing with PWM.
Yes, but I need to switch the pulse between three pins to change the range for my measurement. That would only be possible with software PWM, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Online
Faraday Member
Karma: 131
Posts: 4656
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: December 12, 2012, 11:55:23 am » |
You can do the whole thing with PWM.
Yes, but I need to switch the pulse between three pins to change the range for my measurement. That would only be possible with software PWM, right? You have 3 timers on an Arduino Uno, one 16-bit and two 8-bit. So if 8-bit timers are adequate to get the frequency and pulse width resolution your require, you can use timers to generate pulses on 3 pins. However, timer 0 is normally used to count microseconds. So, when you are using timer 0 to generate pulses, you will need to switch the timekeeping function to timer 2. Alternatively, use a Mega, which has more timers. Alternatively, use a single timer with external gating.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
United Kingdom
Online
Faraday Member
Karma: 131
Posts: 4656
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: December 12, 2012, 01:17:07 pm » |
I've now looked at the ESR meter article. The circuit does look rather complicated. It was designed in the late 1990s and is suited to the technology of the time. Essentially, it feeds pulses of a known current to the capacitor under test, discharging the capacitor more or less fully between pulses. It is assumed that the capacitor does not charge significantly, because the pulse is short and the capacitor under test is assumed to have high capacitance. It measures the pulse amplitude by amplifying it and comparing it with a ramping voltage.
I am concerned that the atmega328p datasheet provides (as far as I can tell) no data on the speed of the analog comparator, so there is no telling whether it is fast enough for this application.
An alternative would be to use the ADC to read the pulse amplitude directly. The ADC sample and hold takes nominally 1.5 ADC clock cycles. The default Arduino ADC clock is 125kHz, so this is 12us, plus an 8us uncertainty about when the sample is taken. If you increase the ADC clock frequency to 250KHz, you halve this time to 10uS total at the expense of slightly reduced accuracy. So if you write the start conversion command to the ADC and then immediately start the pulse, then if the pulse is at least 10us long you should be able to read its amplitude through the ADC.
Another option is to use a faster external A to D converter, or an external sample and hold circuit. Either way, you don't need the ramp[ generator circuit.
If you do decide to use the comparator (or an external comparator), then consider using a DtoA converter to generate the ramp instead of several transistors and resistors and a capacitor.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Formal verification of safety-critical software, software development, and electronic design and prototyping. http://www.eschertech.com
|
|
|
|
Offline
Edison Member
Karma: 114
Posts: 2205
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: December 12, 2012, 05:58:43 pm » |
Here is the output from less than 10 lines of code, measuring a 100uf capacitor with a 10ohm ESR. esr = 9969mOhm esr = 10000mOhm esr = 10030mOhm esr = 10060mOhm esr = 9755mOhm esr = 9785mOhm esr = 9815mOhm esr = 9845mOhm esr = 9876mOhm esr = 9906mOhm esr = 9937mOhm esr = 10312mOhm esr = 10344mOhm esr = 10020mOhm esr = 10052mOhm esr = 10084mOhm esr = 10116mOhm esr = 10137mOhm esr = 10170mOhm esr = 10202mOhm esr = 10588mOhm esr = 10257mOhm esr = 10290mOhm esr = 10679mOhm esr = 10345mOhm esr = 10379mOhm esr = 10402mOhm esr = 10436mOhm esr = 10470mOhm esr = 10493mOhm esr = 10528mOhm esr = 10551mOhm esr = 10586mOhm esr = 10609mOhm esr = 10645mOhm esr = 10668mOhm esr = 10324mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10728mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm esr = 10347mOhm
Display in mOhm. All it takes is a digital pin, an analog pin, and a 330ohm resistor (user defined in the code). Plus a few lines of code on an arduino.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Melbourne, Australia
Offline
Shannon Member
Karma: 218
Posts: 13896
Lua rocks!
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: December 12, 2012, 07:22:14 pm » |
Are you going to reveal what those < 10 lines of code are?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|