A. Perlis, "Public-private key pairs considered harmful," UC Berkeley, Tech. Rep. 4221, June 2005. P. Zhao and L. Subramanian, "Replication no longer considered harmful," in Proceedings of POPL, May 2003. A. Turing, F. Zheng, and D. Ritchie, "Redundancy no longer considered harmful," Journal of Perfect, Large-Scale Theory, vol. 0, pp. 1-16, Oct. 1996. J. Miller and R. T. Morrison, "Superblocks no longer considered harmful," IEEE JSAC, vol. 20, pp. 45-53, Feb. 2004. A. Pnueli, J. Smith, and P. ErdÖS, "Multicast systems considered harmful," Journal of Pseudorandom, Homogeneous Theory, vol. 42, pp. 150-192, Apr. 1990.
just for fun - http://pdos.csail.mit.edu/scigen/ -sometimes when I see questions on the forum I think there is just an Arduino question generator bot active
The references are very amusing.
Well, there's probably a paper: "Coffee no longer considered harmful."
Everyone I know who drinks coffee is of that opinion. I'm thinking it can't be good for our minds long term.
'GOTO Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful.
'"GOTO Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful?
Ah yes, very amusing. In particular the paper:Quote'GOTO Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful.Followed up by:Quote'"GOTO Considered Harmful" Considered Harmful' Considered Harmful?
Please enter a valid email to subscribe
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the subscription, please click the link in the
email we just sent you.
Thank you for subscribing!
via Egeo 16