Pages: [1] 2   Go Down
Author Topic: Quality of RF transmitters  (Read 1425 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offline Offline
Jr. Member
**
Karma: 0
Posts: 54
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Hello,

I'm looking to buy some transmitters and I was thinking of this:

http://www.purlance.com/product/product51.html

They are very cheap and I was wondering if the quality is any good.  Can anyone with experience of buying RF transmitters let me know what they think is good quality?  By this I mean a decent range, long life and the fact that they will transmit/receive smiley  I am willing to pay extra if needed, but if the cheap ones are ok then why not.
Logged

Anaheim CA.
Offline Offline
Faraday Member
**
Karma: 46
Posts: 2865
...
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

the part you mention is a small Receiver on 433 MHz, there is a companion Transmitter. the Radios Chosen are suitable for "Simple" communication between two locations that can "See" each other and are less than 10 meters in range and there are libraries to support those devices. The RF pair is capable of sending and receiving small data packets. If your requirements are larger please consider a more sophisticated device.

Bob
Logged

--> WA7EMS <--
“The solution of every problem is another problem.” -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe
I do answer technical questions PM'd to me with whatever is in my clipboard

Seattle, WA USA
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 601
Posts: 48569
Seattle, WA USA
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Quote
I am willing to pay extra if needed, but if the cheap ones are ok then why not.
What you pay extra for is automatic retransmission in the event of an error, error checking, reliability, range, etc.
Logged

Denmark
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 35
Posts: 1058
Happy Hobbyist
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

I just got a pair of these in the mail today.
I tried to use  Serial.print and the txrx ports of Arduino, but that was not a success.

Then I tried VirtualWire, and now I have over 5m range through a concrete wall.
So for my project, a simple outdoor temp. sensor I am pretty sattisfied. 
Logged

Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 64
Posts: 2489
The last thing you did is where you should start looking.
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

200 feet @ 12 volts
Logged

Seattle, WA USA
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 601
Posts: 48569
Seattle, WA USA
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Quote
200 feet @ 12 volts
1 mile @ 4000 volts.

What are you talking about?
Logged

Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 64
Posts: 2489
The last thing you did is where you should start looking.
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Used the same unit and got a useful range of 200 feet using 12 volts on xmtr.
Logged

Seattle, WA USA
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 601
Posts: 48569
Seattle, WA USA
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Quote
Used the same unit and got a useful range of 200 feet using 12 volts on xmtr.
12 volts supplied by your Arduino? If not, then that tidbit is useless information. You need to define HOW you supplied 12 volts to the transmitter for it to be useful information.
Logged

Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 64
Posts: 2489
The last thing you did is where you should start looking.
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

I used 12 volts from the Arduino power adaptor connector. jack.
Logged

Ontario
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 24
Posts: 864
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

The power output of some of these cheap SAW radios is partly a function of the supply voltage, so using a higher voltage yields a (slightly) longer range.  I've had problems with the reliability of the cheap ones at the full, or a shade above, the max 12V.  I've been sticking with 5V since then.  The ones the O/P linked are definitely cheepies.  I haven't found an alternate supplier for these ones, but there must be one.
http://www.robotshop.com/433mhz-high-sensitivity-transmitter-receiver-pair-rxa30-3.html
These have a really convincing superhet receiver with fancy IF filtering.   Probably the top of the heap for simple on-off-keying.
Logged

the land of sun+snow
Offline Offline
Faraday Member
**
Karma: 159
Posts: 2895
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

FWIW, just today a friend of mine emailed me with the following. He had previously
tried many of the really cheapo units mentioned in this thread ...
Quote
When I was building the ..... [robots] I bought a lot of radio modules and
everybody seemed to say it was easy to transmit data, Personally I found the
results depended more on the weather in some random place rather than the
data I fed in. It was a nightmare. Even using NiCam's Manchester
encoder/decoder chip results were very poor and I had to do a lot of error
checking. Until I changed to the EasyRadio modules, that is, and their
encoder/decoder worked flawlessly. Ok so they are dearer but they work and
no pairing rigmarole required.
http://www.active-robots.com/radio/easy-radio-modules
http://www.active-robots.com/radio/easy-radio-modules/easy-radio-transceiver-eu-usa.html

For my part, I have recently been playing with the HopeRF RFM12B transceivers, which
have become fairly popular, along with the higher powered RFM22B units. I would like
to be able to say something positive about them, as they are fairly cheap, but they
are also very sophisticated electronics, and I am so far finding the 3rd party libraries to
be a nightmare to use. Maybe someone else has had better experience with these.

Also, for years previously, I have been using XBee and XBeePro transceivers, and these
have always been very reliable devices, although not cheap.
« Last Edit: January 08, 2013, 01:54:53 am by oric_dan(333) » Logged

Offline Offline
Jr. Member
**
Karma: 0
Posts: 54
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

OK, I'll think I'll try the cheap one and see how it goes.  My project involves me using one of these to communicate with a RF controlled power socket switch at 433,92 MHz, which turns on/off a water pump indoors at max~10m.  I am using RF and not a relay as it adds some flexibility in my design.  I am guessing with one of these I could learn the advanced protocol of the socket(s) and make a pair, so I turn on always the right socket?
Logged

the land of sun+snow
Offline Offline
Faraday Member
**
Karma: 159
Posts: 2895
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Quote
RF controlled power socket switch at 433,92 MHz

Well, this is a completely different problem from what you seemed to be suggesting
originally. Not only do you need reliable transmission, but you have to know the
protocol on the receiver side. First off, you need to be sure the transmitter is on the
right frequency, and secondly if the receiver uses anything other than simple on/off,
how will you ever learn the protocol? It could be anything at all. Obviously, it would help
to get the receiver spec sheet.
Logged

Australia
Offline Offline
Sr. Member
****
Karma: 11
Posts: 473
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Many of the Radio controlled power points use the SC2262 / SC 2272 chips for the encoder and decoder.
The protocol is very simple and easy to reverse engineer.
You need to pull apart one of the power points to see what the decoder chip inside is.
Some clues that help are the number of power points that can be switched from the encoder.
If its 4 or less, its likley to be the above chips, but if the encoder supports more than 4 , then its a differant chip.
Ive had no success reverse engineering the power points where more than 4 are supported as the manufacturer rubs
the numbers off the decoder chip, and the protocol is very complex.
Logged

Offline Offline
Jr. Member
**
Karma: 0
Posts: 54
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Yes reverse engineering will be a challenge, that is half the point in doing it.  Currently I know very little about RF and hoping I'll know more after doing this.  I live in Finland and it seems the Nexa brand is popular, I have heard that this can be hacked.  Good to know about those chips, do you know if Nexa uses them?  How did you figure out which socket uses which frequency and ID?  Will I need a probe?

What do you mean by reliable transmission?  Why won't those cheap ones be reliable?

Thanks.
Logged

Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
Jump to: