2. Why is a resistor used in the circuit? Alternatively, what would the graph look like without it?
3. Could the first voltage spike be taken care of with a voltage regulator and the second with a diode, or would both be handled by the regulator?
Well, an inductor has high impedance to high frequencies, but low impedance with low frequencies.
So without a resistor... well, never mind the graph. Here's what the circuit would look like though:
Quote from: David82 on Jan 15, 2013, 10:35 pm3. Could the first voltage spike be taken care of with a voltage regulator and the second with a diode, or would both be handled by the regulator?You mean, reducing the first spike by limiting the current?
Also, yeah.. and inductor and cap combo make a good isolator.
Another option is to feed the low-current section through a series resistor, with its own local supply cap. This will make the battery a lower-resistance (therefore, more attractive) supply in comparison.
I see. So you're making the battery the path of least resistance so that it doesn't suck the current and voltage from the camera. Won't the camera still be deprived of current though?
I have an 85mA load (analog camera) that shares a power supply with a 4A load that is occasionally switched on. Even if the power supply is a car battery, the amp draw and voltage to the camera gets sucked away briefly when the 4A load is switched on causing the camera to flicker. I was thinking a 125mA, 10H inductor would maintain the current and voltage to the camera (or at least make the transitions smoother). Is this the right thinking or should I be looking at using a large cap instead?
Please enter a valid email to subscribe
We need to confirm your email address.
To complete the subscription, please click the link in the
email we just sent you.
Thank you for subscribing!
via Egeo 16