Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: Gears vs Belts  (Read 1155 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 6
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

I'm putting together a project to control my gas water heater by turning the knob on the control valve.
I measured the torque required to turn the knob (crudely by attaching vice grips to the knob, then measuring the weight to turn it). Conservatively it needs 5.75 kg-cm. I have a stepper motor rated for 2.3 kg-cm so I thought 1:2.5 gear ratio would be appropriate.
My question is whether I should use gears or a belt. I'll have to devise some way of attaching the motor assembly to the gas heater controller vale and thought that a belt would be a little more forgiving in what will likely be a difficult mounting. I was considering mounting the motor assembly with a light spring to keep tension on the belt.
Any comments or suggestions appreciated!


Logged

Earth
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 53
Posts: 1879
My browser no longer is binding static IP, Floating is the way to go.
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

The knob on the control valve has maximum turn angle?
Logged

Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 6
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

The knob on the control valve turns perhaps 300 degrees.
Logged

SW Scotland
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 17
Posts: 1400
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

If you want to use a belt then it would need to be a toothed belt.  The advantage of a belt drive is that the motor could be offset some distance from the valve.  Spring mounting should not be necessary since a correctly tensioned tooth belt can be "rigidly" fixed.

However, if you can mount the motor intimately with the valve spindle then i'd recommend a simple gear drive.  No slippage guaranteed !
Logged

Dubuque, Iowa, USA
Offline Offline
Faraday Member
**
Karma: 48
Posts: 2544
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

In addition to timing belt / timing pulleys as jackrae described a second option would be roller chain. With plastic, 1/4" pitch roller chain you can easily adjust the length of the chain. A good vendor would be www.sdp-si.com for either method; you might be able to get by for under $20.
Logged

Earth
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 53
Posts: 1879
My browser no longer is binding static IP, Floating is the way to go.
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

The knob on the control valve turns perhaps 300 degrees.

If you decide go though gear drive path,

An other way- relatively new is use smart stepper motors driver;-

Smart stepper motors driver (IC) has stall detection to detect
Quote
'home' position and keep track of forward and backward steps to know where you should be. Missed steps, or someone/something manually turning the shaft will break this method.
.

This will give you position switch less and encoder less solution.
Logged

Offline Offline
Faraday Member
**
Karma: 62
Posts: 3077
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

5.75 kg-cm ?   You must have very strong hands.
Logged

Offline Offline
Sr. Member
****
Karma: 4
Posts: 327
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset


suggest you meassure the angle of the knob directly,
    and 'just' move it to the 'correct' place.

that way, if the motor / chain / pulley / gears slip, you still know where the knob is.

Logged

Earth
Offline Offline
Edison Member
*
Karma: 53
Posts: 1879
My browser no longer is binding static IP, Floating is the way to go.
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

or indirectly measure temperature, once it is in the stable stage.
Logged

Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 6
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Torque is gram-cm, not kg-cm.
Logged

0
Offline Offline
Shannon Member
****
Karma: 214
Posts: 12434
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Torque is gram-cm, not kg-cm.
So many misunderstandings of S.I. in one glib statement!

Firstly you don't mix names and symbols, so g-cm or gram-centimetre, but never gram-cm.

Secondly the kg is a unit of mass, not force.  The "kilogram-force" or kgf would be a suitable
force unit. In SI the kilogram is the base unit, not the gram (historical reasons).

Thirdly in S.I. the newton is always the prefered unit of force, and metre the prefered unit of
length, so newton-metre or N-m is the unit of torque.  And never N-cm (you can say cN-m though smiley-wink.

Now a newton is a joule/metre, so newton-metres are simply joules, but that's forgetting the
rotation, hence joules/radian is actually a more logical unit but for some reason N-m is used rather
than J/rad.

Anyway at least no-one's tried to use "kg/m" or "pounds/foot" or some such real howler smiley
Logged

[ I won't respond to messages, use the forum please ]

Melbourne, Australia
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 8
Posts: 567
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Torque is gram-cm, not kg-cm.

lb-ft or oz-in all the way!!
Logged

Windows serial port monitor: Tellurium | Arduino serial port debugging library: DBG | Cusom LCD char generator | Technical questions will only be answered in forum threads

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to: