Poll
Question: would you want to experiment on 32 bits atmel boards?
yes - 46 (82.1%)
no - 10 (17.9%)
Total Voters: 36

Pages: [1]   Go Down
Author Topic: new development.... and striking breakthrougs  (Read 1291 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
0
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 30
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

http://atmel.com/products/AVR/uc3.asp?family_id=607&source=home

i wander how could it be to make something like a mega out of this little cutie hehehehehe.
do you think we can have something like a superarduino board out of this cutie ?
« Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 06:18:38 am by xevilstar » Logged

0
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 30
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

http://atmel.com/products/AVR/uc3.asp?family_id=607&source=home
look here and then vote
Logged

UK
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 0
Posts: 710
Arduino is Genius
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

I think it might be helpful to describe what your asking.

We (friend and I) thought about it when AVR32 came out (and I have an AVR32 development board too).

So yes AVR32 could be used for a controller board like an Arduino, but why do it?
ARM, e.g. Cortex-M3 is comparable, available, cheaper, and made by several companies, including Atmel itself? Also their is an Open Source GNU C++ compiler for ARM, which is the same foundation as the AVR compiler.

Atmel make ARM Cortex-M3, as well as other ARM's
http://www.atmel.com/products/at91/default.asp?family_id=605&source=main_nav

What is the benefit of the idea?
« Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 04:50:54 pm by gbulmer » Logged

Left Coast, CA (USA)
Offline Offline
Brattain Member
*****
Karma: 361
Posts: 17301
Measurement changes behavior
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

I would favor a upgrade to the Xmega series as a more evolutionary step for the Arduino platform. Same basic mega instruction set with additions and lots and lots of bigger better faster peripherals.

I fear a 32 bit Arduino path would cause a forking in the community and less contributions as a whole.

http://atmel.com/products/AVR/xmega.asp?family_id=607

Lefty
« Last Edit: April 25, 2010, 08:13:52 pm by retrolefty » Logged

UK
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 0
Posts: 710
Arduino is Genius
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Yes, the XMEGA has some significant improvements over an ATmega.

I could be seduced by the fast 12-bit ADC and DAC.

On the the hand, ARM is comparable in cost, sometimes cheaper.
ARM versions with on-board USB end up being noticeably cheaper, though that hasn't shown up in board prices.
Some ARM have on-board ethernet, USB OTG, ...
Some ARM boot themselves over USB, and need no drivers installing on the host. They have driverless USB bootloaders manufactured in.

XMEGA two years ago would have been good.
But now NXP, ST Micro, Atmel, TI/Luminary, Cypress, ... have got some nice silicon. A friend uses PIC32 for everything, and loves it, and he is still a strong AVR fan, but PIC32 is better for his uses.

Don't get me wrong, I adore my Arduino's. I might get a good XMEGA Freeduino, if I found one I liked.

IMHO the technology is likely to fork if we don't support both lower cost and higher performance, and both of those can be done with ARM.  I'm looking at ARM, and porting the libraries. I think the core work will be done before year end anyway, without my help.

But, It is nice to dream  :smiley
« Last Edit: April 26, 2010, 08:27:29 pm by gbulmer » Logged

UK
Offline Offline
God Member
*****
Karma: 0
Posts: 710
Arduino is Genius
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Oops  
Quote
I fear a 32 bit Arduino path would cause a forking in the community and less contributions as a whole.


If the community grows a lot as a result of a wider range of capabilities, a fork may be okay.

If the 32 bit boards were cheaper than existing Arduino's (which appears to be feasible) then maybe AVR's would become the minority.

The major downside of ARM is the lack of dual-in-line through hole parts. If that were fixed, at reasonable cost then things would get closer. DIL ARM parts with USB included would give me a stronger reason to move. I look at those PIC's with USB in DIL packages, and wish Atmel would make some too.
Logged

0
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 30
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

/me is listening
Logged

0
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 30
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

it seems the majority is voting yes ... maybe it is not a bad idea after all...
Logged

huson,MT,USA
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 1
Posts: 19
it's alive!
View Profile
WWW
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Hi. Total newbie here.
I'd probably buy one if all the headers were on .1 inch centers smiley-sad
Logged

0
Offline Offline
Newbie
*
Karma: 0
Posts: 43
Arduino rocks
View Profile
 Bigger Bigger  Smaller Smaller  Reset Reset

Hi Hi. Total newbie here.
I'd probably buy one if all the headers were on .1 inch centers
Logged

Pages: [1]   Go Up
Jump to: