Japan
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 21
|
 |
« on: June 02, 2008, 07:46:23 am » |
Hi, I'm working on a yet another ATMEGA168V based small size Arduino clone with XBee. As described in the images, it's based on Lilypad.  http://www.flickr.com/photos/25323104@N00/2543906059/http://www.flickr.com/photos/25323104@N00/2543906021/Current plan for the next step is as follows: - an optional on-board DC/DC converter (AS1322B)
- a push button for D12
I'm sorry for trouble you, but it would be much appreciated if you give me comments and/or suggestions about this issue. Best, Shigeru
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tokyo, Japan
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 5
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: June 03, 2008, 04:27:33 pm » |
That's great! It is seem no need more things on the board.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: June 03, 2008, 04:28:03 pm by Osamu_Iwasaki »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grenoble/Lyon - France
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 0
Posts: 363
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: June 13, 2008, 08:18:16 pm » |
I see that you used an XBee module. Can't you downsize the whole thing by using another chip with a zigbee stack like a CC430 ? http://focus.ti.com/docs/prod/folders/print/cc2430.htmlMight need a new library / sketch to communicate with, though ^^ (and the QFN48 package is just impossible to solder by hand)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 21
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: June 13, 2008, 08:39:30 pm » |
Hi, Thank you very much for your suggestion. Looks very interesting (actually I got EZ430-RF2500). But might not fit to the short term development, and I have to apply many permissions to use officially. I'll consider for the next major version.  Thanks, Shigeru
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grenoble/Lyon - France
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 0
Posts: 363
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: July 10, 2008, 04:17:42 am » |
Damn this is nice!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Administrator
Cambridge, MA
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 8
Posts: 3532
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: July 10, 2008, 09:20:23 am » |
I agree. Very nice!
One small comment. I know you probably don't want to make the board any longer, but I'm guessing there will be people who will want to be able to make shields out of standard prototyping (perf) board. Having to cut out a notch to be able to access the power and ground pins will make this much more difficult. You might consider moving the XBee back so you can get to all the pins with a rectangular shield.
(We made a similar mistake with the Arduino pin layout and standard perf-board shields, and I'd hate to see it get repeated.)
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
0
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 16
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: July 17, 2008, 07:44:04 am » |
I have a question about working with the XBee, can you use the arduino with the Xbee shield to give a PC a Xbee device? I am working on a device powered by the Arduino, and I need Xbee as part of the application, and I want to know if I can use the USB with the Arduino to control a set of relays and as a Xbee device at the same time
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Woodland, WA
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 17
Always extra parts after reassembly
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: July 17, 2008, 03:43:51 pm » |
Hi, It works great if you jumper the Xbee to use an unused i/o pin and access it via Software Serial, and leave the hardware port available for the USB connection. See this thread for an example: http://www.arduino.cc/cgi-bin/yabb2/YaBB.pl?num=1215072377 I have a question about working with the XBee, can you use the arduino with the Xbee shield to give a PC a Xbee device? I am working on a device powered by the Arduino, and I need Xbee as part of the application, and I want to know if I can use the USB with the Arduino to control a set of relays and as a Xbee device at the same time
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
Will - FunGizmos.com
|
|
|
|
Japan
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 21
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: December 13, 2008, 01:41:35 am » |
Hi, Thank you very much for your kindly suggestions about FIO. Finally, FIO v1.3 (in collaborate with Nathan Seidle) is available at SparkFun. http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/product_info.php?products_id=8957Now the board is compatible with normal prototyping boards (no special shapes needed). Please note, the USB port is just for charging (no USB-to-UART bridge is mounted), but you can upload your sketches with the auto-reset function suggested by Ladyada (thanks!). http://funnel.cc/Hardware/FIO?userlang=enIt would be much appreciated if you give me suggestions about the design of FIO v1.3.  Best, Shigeru
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Left Coast, CA (USA)
Offline
Brattain Member
Karma: 279
Posts: 15340
Measurement changes behavior
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: December 13, 2008, 03:06:25 am » |
Funnel IO is a very impressive design and implementation. I think the built-in Lithium Ion charger chip is brilliant as this design begs to be embedded into weight sensitive applications such as R/C aircraft.
Lefty
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 13, 2008, 03:07:42 am by retrolefty »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Administrator
Cambridge, MA
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 8
Posts: 3532
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: December 13, 2008, 03:49:05 am » |
Looks very nice!
Did you consider including (or did you) a six-pin header (possibly unmounted) to allow the board to be programmed using an FTDI cable? That would lower the cost needed to start loading sketches onto the board.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Japan
Offline
Newbie
Karma: 0
Posts: 21
|
 |
« Reply #14 on: December 13, 2008, 04:00:22 am » |
Hi, Did you consider including (or did you) a six-pin header (possibly unmounted) to allow the board to be programmed using an FTDI cable? That would lower the cost needed to start loading sketches onto the board.
Yes. Please look at the right side (actually top side in the picture). The first six pins are compatible with SparkFun's FTDI Basic Breakout modules, so also compatible with FTDI's. http://www.sparkfun.com/commerce/images/products/08957-01-L.jpgThanks, Shigeru
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|