Torino, Italy
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 2
Posts: 312
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« on: December 23, 2010, 03:55:54 am » |
Hi there,
I'm in the process of evaluating the feasibility of creating an Arduino compatible board based on the 328P-MU which is the same uC of the UNO or Duemilanove but it came in a 5x5 mm QFN 32 package, suitable for ultra small applications.
Anyone ever worked on this? Advices? Tought?
Thanks,
FV
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 23, 2010, 04:15:59 am by fax8 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle WA
Offline
Full Member
Karma: 1
Posts: 205
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: December 23, 2010, 11:13:13 am » |
Smaller than an Arduino Nano?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Torino, Italy
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 2
Posts: 312
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: December 24, 2010, 05:27:13 am » |
Yeah, using small package SMT capacitors, the ATMEGA 328 in QFN32 package and 0.05" spaced pins and possibly using a 4 layer PCB is actually possible to reduce the size considerably.
The goal would be to design a board at least 1/2 the size of the Nano.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle, WA USA
Offline
Brattain Member
Karma: 311
Posts: 35483
Seattle, WA USA
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: December 24, 2010, 08:23:04 am » |
The goal would be to design a board at least 1/2 the size of the Nano. The Duemilanove is at least half the size of the Nano.  Perhaps you meant "at most".
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Torino, Italy
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 2
Posts: 312
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: December 24, 2010, 08:38:54 am » |
Yep, sorry.. I'm Italian and sometime I get confused with language..
X = size of the Pro Mini Y = size of an arduino compatible board based on QFN32
It should be possible to reach: Y <= X/2
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: December 24, 2010, 08:41:13 am by fax8 »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
SF Bay Area (USA)
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 78
Posts: 5453
Strongly opinionated, but not official!
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: December 24, 2010, 05:59:49 pm » |
Connectors have been the usual problem. If you're willing to do 1.27mm connectors on four sides, you can get a lot smaller. But it will also be a lot harder to use. How about offset 2.54mm connectors on top and bottom? Either set could still plug into a breadboard.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Torino, Italy
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 2
Posts: 312
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: December 24, 2010, 06:57:41 pm » |
Hi westfw, thanks for your suggestion.
I actually thought about that as a possibility.. It could work, I should do some designs as tests to check for it's feasibility..
Anyway, I don't think that breadboard compatibility is actually important as I imagine this board to be used in very specific applications. Eg, It could be a good thing to have for people already having PCB designing experience and they could just as a building block in size constrained applications when they would need to add Arduino intelligence to their designs..
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Seattle WA
Offline
Full Member
Karma: 1
Posts: 205
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: December 25, 2010, 04:37:21 pm » |
I think that's a cool idea. I've been thinking about a shield for high altitude balloon/rocket tracking, and having a much smaller Arduino available would be cool for some variants.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Boston area, metrowest
Offline
Brattain Member
Karma: 242
Posts: 16504
Available for Design & Build services
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: December 27, 2010, 01:12:17 am » |
I think this SIP version is pretty cool. I am going to try this and the ardweeny when I finish my supply or promini's.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Torino, Italy
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 2
Posts: 312
Arduino rocks
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: December 29, 2010, 08:37:10 pm » |
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|