|
|
Milano, Italy
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 10
Posts: 3080
Sideralis Arduino!
|
 |
« Reply #16 on: January 29, 2011, 10:17:11 am » |
We bought nixies from the same vendor :-) Mine are those http://cgi.ebay.it/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=400174245756&ssPageName=STRK:MEWNX:ITI am going to try to drive them at 170v and see... After reading about your experience I was thinking that multiplexing and optocouplers should be the safest way...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wigan, UK
Offline
God Member
Karma: 18
Posts: 807
|
 |
« Reply #17 on: January 29, 2011, 10:22:31 am » |
Yeah, optocouplers are the way to go!
If I figure out what happened I'll report back on here.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
0
Offline
Full Member
Karma: 5
Posts: 200
|
 |
« Reply #18 on: January 29, 2011, 02:31:58 pm » |
BTW guys, small neon bulbs should have at least 100K resistors (some use 200K) at 170+V or else they could burn out themselves or your circuit. I am able to multiplex them at 170v with a 100K resistor. Remember that the gas inside them will change its resistance until the voltage across the lamp is the sustaining voltage. A 200K resistor (which is probably better for long life) makes them look a little sputtery.
My A1As regulate themselves at 60V, which means that 110V gets dropped over the anode resistor. 110V/100000Ω=1.1mA. Almost twice the recommended amount, but I figure since I'm multiplexing... Still probably not healthy.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: January 29, 2011, 02:34:11 pm by wyager »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Milano, Italy
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 10
Posts: 3080
Sideralis Arduino!
|
 |
« Reply #19 on: January 29, 2011, 04:41:37 pm » |
wyager, thanks a lot for the advice. I am going to follow it!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wigan, UK
Offline
God Member
Karma: 18
Posts: 807
|
 |
« Reply #20 on: January 29, 2011, 04:48:13 pm » |
wyager, thanks a lot for the advice. I am going to follow it!
This ^ !
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
0
Offline
Full Member
Karma: 5
Posts: 200
|
 |
« Reply #21 on: January 29, 2011, 04:52:40 pm » |
No problem. Also, 666 posts cowjam. 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Milano, Italy
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 10
Posts: 3080
Sideralis Arduino!
|
 |
« Reply #22 on: January 29, 2011, 05:17:12 pm » |
the number of the beast  By the way i see that you (wyager) use a lot of transistors for driving your project. Don't you have a 74141 off hand? ps. the optocouples i need, TLP627, are damn expensive 
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
0
Offline
Full Member
Karma: 5
Posts: 200
|
 |
« Reply #23 on: January 29, 2011, 05:35:09 pm » |
the number of the beast  By the way i see that you (wyager) use a lot of transistors for driving your project. Don't you have a 74141 off hand? ps. the optocouples i need, TLP627, are damn expensive  I was basing my project off parts I could get from digikey and I couldn't find any HV nixie drivers. The MPSA42s were only like 5 bucks for 25 IIRC, so I just went with those. I suppose after the shift registers and resistors and perfboard, the 74141s off ebay would have been cheaper, but it was a learning experience anyway.  BTW, are the optocouples to protect the rest of the circuit from high voltage?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wigan, UK
Offline
God Member
Karma: 18
Posts: 807
|
 |
« Reply #24 on: January 30, 2011, 12:04:00 pm » |
I don't know if this will have contributed to the burnout, but I have discovered that I'd got the pins all muddled.
The power and ground pins were fine, but I had misinterpreted the position of the nixie pins so that I had the number sequence reversed.
I had also failed to spot the utterly confusing layout of the logic pins on the IC. If you look you'll see that the pins are labelled A, D, B, C (in that order). The logic chart is labelled D, C, B, A.
I will have undoubtedly sent things to the IC that it wasn't expecting, though the logic chart says that should merely have resulted in no output.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Milano, Italy
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 10
Posts: 3080
Sideralis Arduino!
|
 |
« Reply #25 on: January 30, 2011, 12:29:22 pm » |
BTW, are the optocouples to protect the rest of the circuit from high voltage?
I need them for multiplexing the nixies. If I connect all the cathodes to the nixie driver IC then I need a way to switch on the 170v anodes. I am experimenting the tlc5940 but I can't let it manage the high voltage. That's way I tought about optocouplers connected to the high voltage anche my TLC to open and close the gate. I had also failed to spot the utterly confusing layout of the logic pins on the IC. If you look you'll see that the pins are labelled A, D, B, C (in that order). The logic chart is labelled D, C, B, A.
So the datasheed is wrong?? Anyway it looks like a strange way for burning an IC...
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wigan, UK
Offline
God Member
Karma: 18
Posts: 807
|
 |
« Reply #26 on: January 30, 2011, 12:43:27 pm » |
No, the datasheet is fine. I hadn't read it properly.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wigan, UK
Offline
God Member
Karma: 18
Posts: 807
|
 |
« Reply #27 on: January 30, 2011, 12:55:44 pm » |
Another question: Ground sharing.
Do I share the ground for the 180v and 5v circuits?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Milano, Italy
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 10
Posts: 3080
Sideralis Arduino!
|
 |
« Reply #28 on: January 30, 2011, 01:02:21 pm » |
Just in time, I was going to ask the same question. I think that no, for what I can understand for driving for example the neon bulbs you have to ground them to the arduino with the high voltage mpsa42 transistor, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Wigan, UK
Offline
God Member
Karma: 18
Posts: 807
|
 |
« Reply #29 on: January 30, 2011, 01:14:09 pm » |
I hope someone answers soon, I'm about to run another set up (using a shift register) and I don't to kill anything else.
Thing is, the 74141 has one ground pin and runs 5v and high volt so that must share a ground, right?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|