Global Moderator
Dallas
Offline
Shannon Member
Karma: 129
Posts: 10380
|
 |
« on: February 08, 2011, 02:35:37 am » |
I'm shopping for solder wick. The wick is coated with one of two kinds of flux. The flux provides either the "fastest wicking action" or the "cleanest wick -- clear, non-reactive residues". I've never used wick so I have no idea which is more important (or if it even matters that much). I'm going to try my hand at SMD soldering so I'll be using the wick to remove (lots of  ) solder bridges. I think "fast" would be best in that case. Opinions?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
0
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 4
Posts: 262
bluesmokelabs.com
|
 |
« Reply #1 on: February 08, 2011, 08:02:00 am » |
Go with either, I've never noticed a difference. Plus you will probably end up putting your own flux on it. Buy a flux pen at the same time, it works wonders!
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Austin, TX
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 42
Posts: 5248
CMiYC
|
 |
« Reply #2 on: February 08, 2011, 12:15:22 pm » |
Personally, if there is a difference I'd rather go with fast.
Any product that is "no-clean" falls into the same category as hand sanitizer. Sure it may kill everything, but then you just have a bunch of dead germs on your hands.
In other words, I still clean my boards when I use stuff with "no-clean" flux in it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Georgia, US
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 4
Posts: 372
Arduino makes my head hurt :(
|
 |
« Reply #3 on: February 08, 2011, 02:08:51 pm » |
Any product that is "no-clean" falls into the same category as hand sanitizer. Sure it may kill everything, but then you just have a bunch of dead germs on your hands.
I didn't want to know that
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Boston area, metrowest
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 270
Posts: 17041
Available for Design & Build services
|
 |
« Reply #4 on: February 08, 2011, 02:52:13 pm » |
Go with thinner (narrower?) too, heats up faster to melt the solder quicker.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Nowhere
Offline
God Member
Karma: 3
Posts: 851
|-\ |\|\
|
 |
« Reply #5 on: February 08, 2011, 04:59:30 pm » |
Definitely use your own flux, though, as said earlier.
I successfully soldered my first SMD board (SF simon) a month ago (new soldering iron for christmas) and had hardly any luck with the wick until applying flux to it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Dallas
Offline
Shannon Member
Karma: 129
Posts: 10380
|
 |
« Reply #6 on: February 08, 2011, 08:07:35 pm » |
Thanks! Just the sort of advice I was hoping to get!
The stuff I'm looking at comes in # sizes: #1, #2, #3, etcetera. The #1 size is the thinnest / narrowest. How are your's measured? Also # sizes? In millimeters? Inches?
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Boston area, metrowest
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 270
Posts: 17041
Available for Design & Build services
|
 |
« Reply #7 on: February 08, 2011, 08:26:57 pm » |
Don't know, can't find it at the moment. Is fairly wide tho, not that good for surface mount.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Boston area, metrowest
Online
Brattain Member
Karma: 270
Posts: 17041
Available for Design & Build services
|
 |
« Reply #8 on: February 08, 2011, 10:34:51 pm » |
Found it - MG Chemicals, 0.075", fine braid, static free. Cat # 443 No mention of flux. Guess its not as wide as I thought it was. Haven't tried using it with flux added. Usually I use a solder sucker to get most solder off, little cleanup with wick if needed.
|
|
|
|
« Last Edit: February 08, 2011, 10:38:48 pm by CrossRoads »
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
0
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 4
Posts: 262
bluesmokelabs.com
|
 |
« Reply #9 on: February 09, 2011, 06:32:45 am » |
The 2.5mm is the ideal size, 1.5 tends to fill up with solder faster than you can move it and 3.5(I think thats next size up) takes too long to heat and you end up burning flux on the board.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Central MN, USA
Offline
Faraday Member
Karma: 38
Posts: 6053
Phi_prompt, phi_interfaces, phi-2 shields, phi-panels
|
 |
« Reply #10 on: February 09, 2011, 10:35:35 am » |
So what does flux do in a wick? Does flux reduce the melting temperature of solder? I never understood the use of flux.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
0
Offline
Sr. Member
Karma: 4
Posts: 262
bluesmokelabs.com
|
 |
« Reply #11 on: February 09, 2011, 10:39:11 am » |
It cleans the metal of oxides that occur under heating and allows the solder to flow alot better.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Dallas
Offline
Shannon Member
Karma: 129
Posts: 10380
|
 |
« Reply #12 on: February 09, 2011, 02:43:26 pm » |
...in addition, the manufacturer of the "no clean" wick I found claims their flux cleans old flux. I assume that requires some combination of: chemically altering the old flux, floating the old flux to the solder surface, trapping the old flux.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
Global Moderator
Dallas
Offline
Shannon Member
Karma: 129
Posts: 10380
|
 |
« Reply #13 on: February 11, 2011, 11:43:07 pm » |
I went with PROWICK #4 from TECHSPRAY (fast). I'll report back after I've used it.
|
|
|
|
|
Logged
|
|
|
|
|
|