Go Down

Topic: Laws of the Forum (Read 3425 times) previous topic - next topic

Chagrin


Quote
Funny how a humorous thread about observed laws (note, not rules) has drifted off topic.

Yes I was thinking that. Some people just don't get the joke I suppose.

Maybe that's one of the forum laws.

GoForSmoke

I won't say LAWS but I usually observe on any given week at least:

one thread asking how to turn serial into numbers or vice-versa,
one problem sketch with at least two delays possibly written in loops,
one problem sketch crashing ram,
four plus "new to all this" members who all want to do something complicated for which they know pretty much nothing about most or all of the parts including how they're supposed interact....

and

a few real gems and a lot of good solid know-how.
Nick Gammon on multitasking Arduinos:
1) http://gammon.com.au/blink
2) http://gammon.com.au/serial
3) http://gammon.com.au/interrupts

Nick Gammon

You know what I like? When someone joins the forum with some ridiculously complicated project that you think "wow, I wouldn't tackle that" and then, with a bit of help, two week later they post a YouTube video which shows that they worked it all out, overcame their problems, and got the damn thing going.
Please post technical questions on the forum, not by personal message. Thanks!

More info:
http://www.gammon.com.au/electronics

Grumpy_Mike

Yes well that's why we are all here, is it not.  8)

Msquare

Getting back to the subject heading as I understood it (ie like Murphys Laws)

The 80/20 law: 80% of the threads cover 20% of the problem space.

Well, it is a bit exagerated, but these laws usually mention 80/20 (or 90/10)

Nick Gammon


Getting back to the subject heading ...


Rule #42.

By the time you get to page 3, everyone has forgotten what the thread is supposed to be about.
Please post technical questions on the forum, not by personal message. Thanks!

More info:
http://www.gammon.com.au/electronics

DuaneB

Everything in Arduino can have at least one viable answer apart from - is Arduino object orientated ?

Duane B
Read this
http://rcarduino.blogspot.com/2012/04/servo-problems-with-arduino-part-1.html
then watch this
http://rcarduino.blogspot.com/2012/04/servo-problems-part-2-demonstration.html

Rcarduino.blogspot.com

Graynomad

What was this thread about again? OP can you post the latest code.

______
Rob
Rob Gray aka the GRAYnomad www.robgray.com

Grumpy_Mike

Code: [Select]
while(no_one_gets_it) {
  call(reply #1)
}
if(serious) { think(hum) } else { think(har) }

Nick Gammon


... at least read the effing title, hopefully on a good day the entire post, your experience does not equal every possible situation.


That's probably me ... sometimes my eyes glaze over and I start skimming.
Please post technical questions on the forum, not by personal message. Thanks!

More info:
http://www.gammon.com.au/electronics

Osgeld

its probably all of us to a point, though some are worse about it than others
http://arduino.cc/forum/index.php?action=unread;boards=2,3,4,5,67,6,7,8,9,10,11,66,12,13,15,14,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,86,87,89,1;ALL

Graynomad

I see your problem Mike

call(reply #1);

Also "no_one_gets_it" should be declared as "volatile __rtfm__".

______
Rob
Rob Gray aka the GRAYnomad www.robgray.com

AWOL

I think the use of "volatile" there is just so profound.
Bravo.
"Pete, it's a fool looks for logic in the chambers of the human heart." Ulysses Everett McGill.
Do not send technical questions via personal messaging - they will be ignored.

Go Up