GoForSmoke:
When Mike writes
- Please learn some physics because it says you can't do it.
the proper response is to engage as to why unless you've already danced around that point. AFAIK you two argued about different things that seemed to have morphed along the bent or straight tube way but here now he has made a definite unequivocal statement.
Argh, I was going to let it drop. Last post even if there’s a reply, promise.
Mike’s list of six points (1, 2, 3, 3 again, 4 and 5) weren’t aimed at me...he said they were the “levels of possibility” he’s employed over the years. I don’t think physics was the issue...well, maybe, but more in terms of different environments or a missing “piece”...which I think is what Tony Wilks added in.
I’d also hope if Mike’s been doing it so long that occasionally, particularly when he’s used replies 3, 3(a) or 4, (even perhaps 5 if I’m right about Tony’s work) someone has actually come back and surprised him.