You did it again
I am not sure what "it" you are referring to.
I actually agree with your statement that if no one is hurt, we should leave it alone.
But to satisfy that condition (or assumption) that no one is hurt, Schwartz and his team will have to prove that no one is hurt. If he cannot, he will have to go to the court and let his peers judge his innocence (or lack of).
That, in case you didn't realize, has no thing to do with presumption of innocence.