(Out of Date) Guide: How to Insert Uploaded Images in a Post

I think it would be useful to mention that you need to click Reply(rather than using Quick Reply) to be able to attach files to a reply.

pert:
I think it would be useful to mention that you need to click Reply(rather than using Quick Reply) to be able to attach files to a reply.

Added.

Thanks for the suggestion.

I've tried to find the stored attached files so I could link to them but no luck. As I attach the same files over and over the names must be changed when they are stored.

zoomkat:
I've tried to find the stored attached files so I could link to them but no luck. As I attach the same files over and over the names must be changed when they are stored.

After you upload the file yet again, what if you right click and use "Search Google for image"? It wouldn't really do you much good but it may, at least, satisfy your curiosity.

Cool solution!! I did it!!!

I thought I'd attempt to answer the following question here instead of in the thread where it was asked.

dave-in-nj:
is that photo now controlled by the forum ? or, if you change the photo will the new one be displayed ?
in FaceBook, only the link to the photo was used, the program pulled the photo from the link each time.
once the hackers found out about this, they would post pictures of puppies and such, then switch the photo and leave the original URL. then viewers were shown whatever the hacker wanted.
something I have been curious about.
also, since I host my photos on imgur, what happens to my photos if I loose the account or they end service ?

If the image had been uploaded to the forum, then the image is on the forum's servers. I doubt there's a way to modify the image once it has been uploaded. I'm pretty sure you could replace the uploaded file with a new image but this new file would need to be added to the post the usual way.

If you link to an image from an external site, then changing the image would also change what people saw on the forum.

If the externally hosted image is deleted, then the image will no longer be available from the forum.

I think it would be useful to mention that you need to click Reply(rather than using Quick Reply) to be able to attach files to a reply.

When you use Quick Reply do a "Preview" and attchement menu will apear.

zoomkat:
I've tried to find the stored attached files so I could link to them but no luck. As I attach the same files over and over the names must be changed when they are stored.

The problem is the deliberate obfuscation that for no sensible reason, is implemented in the forum software. It refers to them by a "dark Web" reference; they are given a number and only ever referenced by that number using a PHP server script.

For example the image link in the first post above is "http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=364156.0;attach=146178" which is not an image URL but something the PHP script reads and inserts its version of the file. You can refer to that as frequently as you like, using it as an image link, but you can never see the file itself and if the attachment is removed from the original post, the file completely disappears from all links. This is presumably the phenomenon LarryD has experienced.

Paul__B:
The problem is the deliberate obfuscation that for no sensible reason,

The general philosophy of the Forum developers seems to be "if there is a more complicated way to do something let's use it.

...R

I find it really informative. Thank you for sharing your technique with us :slight_smile:

It's a pity this technique is needed though. Before the site was "up"-graded year or so back, it was much easier.

Robin2:
I have used that technique also. Alas I cannot remember when or in what Thread so I can't check if it is still working.

It would be a real PITA if they have broken a very convenient feature.

...R

I haven't had the images break yet, the image in my sig is done this way. The original thread has it listed at almost a 1/4 million downloads over almost a year & still is going strong.

Also if anybody wants to find any attachments they have posted, click this link here: http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;sa=attach

The method does not work with Internet Explorer 10 or 11.

The original tag...

[img width=281 height=500]http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=406514.0;attach=170844[/img]

The working tag...

[img width=281 height=500]http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?action=dlattach;topic=406514.0;attach=170844;image[/img]

Please append;imageto the end of the URL.

Do people still use Internet Explorer?

Why does Microsoft insist on making it non-standard?

...R

The IE must remain non-standard, so that as many web pages as possible can be viewed only by the latest IE on the latest Windows version, not on older Windows or by FF on a Mac or Linux machine :-]

Robin2:
Do people still use Internet Explorer?

I suspect the vast majority of Americans accessing the forum from work have no choice.

Why does Microsoft insist on making it non-standard?

This particular problem is a question of recovering gracefully. The forum software includes a disposition tag that conflicts with the way the data stream is being used. Obviously, Firefox and Chrome recover gracefully using the data stream the way the HTML author intended. Internet Explorer, on the other hand, just does not bother.

So, it is actually possible Microsoft is adhering to the latest internet standards and Firefox / Chrome are not. But I doubt it.

In any case, recovering gracefully should always trump any standards.

Should that be mentioned? :slight_smile:

...R

Microsoft is/has replaced I.E. with Edge (Windows 10)
https://www.microsoft.com/en-ca/windows/microsoft-edge

I am convinced 'Edge' will be the answer to all the worlds woes.

NOT !

Robin2:
Should that be mentioned? :slight_smile:

:slight_smile:

LarryD:
Microsoft is/has replaced I.E. with Edge (Windows 10)
Get to Know Microsoft Edge

I am convinced 'Edge' will be the answer to all the worlds woes.

NOT !

Yeah, its a bit incorrect. Religion and terrorism should be the same line...