CrossRoads:
Wirewrap "disadvantage" counterpoint:
Inexpensive sockets can be found. I regularly purchase lots of 30-and 40-pin long strips and breakoff only the amount needed.
OK, I learned something.
CrossRoads:
Since sockets are used, components can easily be removed & changed without potentially disastrous unsoldering.
I always use sockets with Verowire too; but I don't need wire-wrap sockets, almost any sort of DIP socket will do.
CrossRoads:
Stripping wire is not difficult
No, but measuring the required length, cutting and stripping it does take time.
CrossRoads:
- and each and every joint does not need soldering afterwards.
Soldering the joints takes very little time. I suspect that wrapping the Verowire wire around the IC socket with the wiring pen and soldering it takes no more time than wire wrapping 1 wire, and certainly less than wire-wrapping 2 wires.
CrossRoads:
Since there is no soldering, changes and/or corrections are easy to make.
The number of corrections should be much lower than the number of wires initial wired. But corrections are easy to make with Verowire. Use a solder sucker to remove most of the solder from the socket pin, cut out any wires you don't want, add new wires, and resolder.
CrossRoads:
N components need a wire if all are daisychained - but its also very easy to make a change on a board if needed.
If I wire A-B and B-C using wire wrap, that's no different to wiring A-B-C with Verowire. If I decide I don't want A-B or B-C, then I can just snip it out. If I don't want A-C, then it's no different whether I use wire wrap or Verowire, I have to remove or snip out both A-B and B-C.
CrossRoads:
Board does not have to be deep - different level wirewrap pins are available if fewer connections are being made.
Where does that leave you when you need to make corrections?
CrossRoads:
No wiring combs are needed.
OK, I'm spending £0.02 (about 3c) on wiring combs, but by using non-wire-wrap IC sockets, I've probably saved more than that already.
CrossRoads:
In the end: Either method can be used for prototypes.
Quite so.