Go Down

Topic: Long term stability of internal RC oscillator (Read 3839 times) previous topic - next topic

Smajdalf

Hi,
has anyone experience with long term stability of internal RC oscillator and/or WDT oscillator of AVRs? If I calibrate such oscillator against precise time source (GPS, RTC) may I use it as reasonable source of time provided regulated voltage and near constant (indoor) temperature or will it drift too much? I mean +/- minute in a month or so.

uxomm

My experience with internal RC oscillator:
By tuning you can get a reasonable accuracy of about +/- 1% for a given voltage and temperature. So the frequency may be "good enough" for UART if (and only if) voltage *and* temperature stay constant (UART serial requires timing to within +/-2% or so).

I mean +/- minute in a month or so.
So let's calculate how many minutes it may be off within one month:
60 * 24 * 30 = 43200 minutes per month
1% of 43200 = 432
So it may be +/- 432 minutes off within a month (that is about 7 hours).
Way too much...

But even with a crystal (50 ppm) you may not meet your needs.
I would recommend a real time clock: DS3231 (accuracy +/- some seconds per year).

Always decouple electronic circuitry.

Smajdalf

You are speaking about short term accuracy. I imagine the frequency is fluctuating around "mean frequency". While the fluctuations may be quite large and interfere with precise measuring or asynchronous communication the "mean frequency" may be stable. For example if it takes 121,954 seconds for WDT set to 1s timeout to overflow 100,000 times it is reasonable to expect next 100k overflows will take very close to 121,954 seconds - much closer than +/- 1%. But I have no idea how close it will be. And how close it will be after a year?

Coding Badly

Quote
...much closer than +/- 1%...
For the internal oscillator I'm going with "maybe".

For the watchdog oscillator I'm going with "no".

However, "much closer" are weasel words making it impossible to answer your question.


Smajdalf

For the internal oscillator I'm going with "maybe".

For the watchdog oscillator I'm going with "no".

However, "much closer" are weasel words making it impossible to answer your question.
Do you know anything about the topic or are you just trying to "look smart"? I don't understand what you don't understand about my statement.

Coding Badly

I don't understand what you don't understand about my statement.
"Much closer".  Would that be 0.1%?  0.001%?  0.05%?  0.9999%?

While "much closer" may mean something concrete to you it means nothing to anyone else.


Smajdalf

... much closer than +/- 1%. But I have no idea how close it will be. And how close it will be after a year?
"Much closer".  Would that be 0.1%?  0.001%?  0.05%?  0.9999%?

While "much closer" may mean something concrete to you it means nothing to anyone else.
While "much closer" may not be rigorously defined I still don't see how it makes my questions impossible to answer since they don't use it.

MrMark

#7
Apr 28, 2017, 04:45 pm Last Edit: Apr 28, 2017, 04:46 pm by MrMark
You are speaking about short term accuracy. I imagine the frequency is fluctuating around "mean frequency". While the fluctuations may be quite large and interfere with precise measuring or asynchronous communication the "mean frequency" may be stable. For example if it takes 121,954 seconds for WDT set to 1s timeout to overflow 100,000 times it is reasonable to expect next 100k overflows will take very close to 121,954 seconds - much closer than +/- 1%. But I have no idea how close it will be. And how close it will be after a year?
Clock error is going to have both a bias from the desired mean and a random variation.  It's the bias term which contributes to long term drift.  Getting drift significantly better than 1%* is simply not going to be possible with an IC RC circuit.  "Significantly better" in this context is "approaching 0.002%" per your 1 minute per month drift requirement (see uxomm's post above).

2E-5 performance will require a crystal oscillator time base.  Good crystals intended for timekeeping with performance on the order of 1E-6 are not expensive items.

Coding Badly

#8
Apr 28, 2017, 07:59 pm Last Edit: Apr 28, 2017, 07:59 pm by Coding Badly

Given the constraints you have given...

Quote
...provided regulated voltage and near constant (indoor) temperature...
Quote
For example if it takes 121,954 seconds for WDT set to 1s timeout to overflow 100,000 times it is reasonable to expect next 100k overflows will take very close to 121,954 seconds - much closer than +/- 1%.
...I stand by reply #3.

The watchdog oscillator is very sensitive to temperature / voltage.  Minor temperature changes of the die (e.g. manipulating digital I/O) will likely prevent you from getting "much closer than +/- 1%".  Unless you are building an application that performs no useful work.

The internal oscillator is less sensitive.  You may be able to get "much closer than +/- 1%".


srnet

#9
Apr 29, 2017, 11:21 pm Last Edit: Apr 29, 2017, 11:21 pm by srnet
If I calibrate such oscillator against precise time source (GPS, RTC) may I use it as reasonable source of time provided regulated voltage and near constant (indoor) temperature or will it drift too much? I mean +/- minute in a month or so.
Why dont you calibrate the oscillator as you suggest, monitor it over a month or so, and report back ?

 
No PMs please, they dont get answered.

Smajdalf

Why dont you calibrate the oscillator as you suggest, monitor it over a month or so, and report back ?
Because it will take a month. I tried to ask before I try it if someone tried this and failed or succeeded.
Looks like noone (here) knows about it, just guessing.

Coding Badly

Looks like noone (here) knows about it, just guessing.
When I started participating in this conversation I was willing, if needed, to dug up the several months of data I have collected for the watchdog oscillator over various voltages and temperatures.  Given the fact that I'm "just guessing" I guess I won't bother.


srnet

I cant see what would be gained even if you had a view as to what what the stability was.

Any test of that type would only be valid for one particular micro and could not be used to accuratly predict and guarantee how another example might behave.

Thus most reasonable designers, when they want such long term stability, would not be relying on the internal RC clock or WDT. 
No PMs please, they dont get answered.

Smajdalf

When I started participating in this conversation I was willing, if needed, to dug up the several months of data I have collected for the watchdog oscillator over various voltages and temperatures.  Given the fact that I'm "just guessing" I guess I won't bother.
Sorry, I didn't want to insult you. Your answer used wods as "likely" and "may" without any closer information. I thought it is just your opinion withot analysing such data. I am aware this question may be interesting for me but there is little real use of it so I was not suprised noone came with much information. If you have such data I would be glad if you found them and be willing to share.

MrMark

Because it will take a month.
You can get a pretty good idea of drift rate much quicker than that.  I've done alignment of 5E-11 rubidium standards in under an hour staring at Lissajous patterns on an analog scope back in the day.

I've looked at the AVR datasheet and some application notes and one thing to consider is that the resolution of the calibration register is about 0.3% so that rules out using the hardware directly.  One could do additional compensation in software, perhaps even performing some form of temperature compensation, but it doesn't seem like a particularly robust approach.

In any case, the question has piqued my curiosity enough that I'm working on a test configuration to collect some data.  Since I've been playing in the stm8/stm32 domain recently, I'll be collecting against those rather than AVRs, at least initially, but I expect the behaviors are broadly the same.  I'll post some data to this thread when I have it.

Go Up