Hi EmilyJane,
Your suggestions on the male headers is a good one. It is something that came up during development. On version 2 we'll look at this much more closely. It would be a convenient thing to have.
I see that you are a god member level user. My post here was my first to this forum. If you feel my helloworld post about our sensor belongs in another section, which would you suggest? This seems most apt to me. The reason I didn't post it in the New Products section was for fear of double posting.
We are documenting the project now. Thanks for asking those details. First step was to get funding to develop it as envisioned, and to support our time way from our day jobs. As we are doing a kickstarter event, I was trying to spread the word to people who would be interested in an open-source bio sensor. People don't read long paragraphs online, or rather, most people do not. I keep my descriptions short b/c I value others' time. My writing style is pithy, but not meaningless.
Your point about environmental noise and real-world user noise is a very salient one. It's one of THE big problems to solve. There is no silver bullet for this, but we think we addressed it pretty well. Or, at least better then what's available now.
You'll be able to download the software in a few weeks and see it. The hardware techniques we used will be visible to most when they see the sensor in person or in application. We want the documentation to be done right. We hope to have that online by end of this month. This is really still a new project. It has not shipped yet. The finer points about the design and techniques will be documented to our best abilities on the project's website. Hopefully other developers and users will share their experiences with the Pulse Sensor and we can all learn how to improve upon it even more.
I personally would like to see an open-source pulse sensor be cheaper, easier to use, and more accurate then proprietary heart-rate sensors.