and even 'invented' the 'hole' flow analogy to make their flawed concept work
So your first paragraph essentially reinforces what I said back in reply #1....Don
Quoteand even 'invented' the 'hole' flow analogy to make their flawed concept workNo that was not the reason for hole flow. It came about because of doped semiconductors where flow in P type semiconductors is actually easier to describe in terms of hole flow, than electron flow.Now get this holes even have mass, in certain parts of the conduction band. This is the inverse of the electrons that have negative mass at the same point. A negative mass is one that is repelled by a gravitational field instead of being attracted to it. Holes also carry positive charge, so holes are just as real as electrons.
General relativity is a weak explanation for gravity and the absence of an electron in an orbital and the forces involved are some kind of rubbish? Oh wait, did I check my horoscope? Did I like, channel from the home planet with the right crystal? Did I get the real answers while meeting the groovy minds up on the astral plane? Like, are the vibes right or not? Ohhhh, wow! Yeah, science is such a downer, man. All that math and stuff just sucks! Like you know, the Tea Party is really onto something, we should all go back to like before all that stuff and get our Aristotle-heads on.
If I make a bi-metal junction then one side will be electron rich while the other side will be hole rich.
It's easy to treat electrons as particles when dealing with electricity -up to some point- but that's not to say that electrons are particles or that any model we have is the full correct description.
Whatever is happening, it is simply beyond logical explanation.