It does not matter whether your link is the exact shop. But it does matter that the photos on the link match the pcb on your desk.
And why would I give a link with an image that wasn’t an exact match? Maybe you’ve come across some situations where this was not the case? I didn’t feel it necessary for redundantly mentioning that, since most people do typically mention differences, if any are applicable. I guess there’s more variance than I am aware of. But yes, that is an exact match, to be clear.
Anyways, thanks for your thorough test. I was not aware that the ILI9341 was different in that respect, and that the Read_ID_bitbash project was not the right one to be running.
I do have a suggestion, though, so that this doesn’t happen again…
Why not merge TFT_Read_Reg and Read_ID_bitbash into a singular ‘Read_ID’ project. Put a #define and an explanation for the lay-person so that they not only have a singular go to project for determining IDs, but, has information like what was just unearthed for me in your previous comment?
TFT_Read_Reg.ino is for SDI, SDO style controllers like ILI9341.
I can test the ILI9341 that I have with it right away, if I see a fresh check-in!