jremington:
You are just kidding yourself, looking at an "intentionally obfuscated" patent application.Buy the device and use a scope to figure out what it really does. I'll bet the details don't matter, though.
Any reason for what seems to be an overly confrontational tone? You do realize that people are here to learn, right?
Also, I believe I had mentioned that the ideal solution would be to buy the device and hook it up to the scope. If I wanted to spend the time convincing my doctor of it's efficacy so that he might prescribe it and also spend the $700 O would have done so already. I'm not trying to reverse engineer the damned thing so I can sell a cheap Chinese knock off, I'm trying to do so to: A - learn, and B - save some money and a possible headache with my doc.
To your last point: yes, the details do indeed matter. Just because the patent shows a waveform over 10 seconds does not mean that the timing can't be modified. Yes, it is intentionally vague. Just because that's so doesn't mean that there isn't enough data available to extrapolate a solution.
Question: Why do you contribute to threads is all you're going to do is arrogantly sit up on your high horse and make assumptions? Is it to reinforce your feelings of intellectual superiority?
This used to be a resource where people could throw an idea out there and actually get a constructive response. It mostly still is. Thanks for your input though...