I told ChatGPT about the disclamer under its answers

Hi, I pointed out in a forum thread this disclaimer in ChatGPT.

This Max's response, yes I have named my ChatGPT Max.

Why Max, because he has the ability to "miss it by that much"... (Google "Get Smart")

The AFL reference is sarcasm, my AFL football team lost the Grand Final this weekend.

Yes I have tried to "humanize" Max somewhat as I use him for work, looking for component equivalents.
He can do in less than 30seconds what would take me 30minutes to do.

I did ask him to list the other defaults.


Note number 3..

Tom.... :smiley: :+1: :coffee: :australia:

:grin:

Hi, got Max to make me some arrays for 8x8 LED displays.

 {
    0b00111100,
    0b01100000,
    0b01111100,
    0b01100110,
    0b01100160, // typo? correct to 01100110
    0b01100110,
    0b00111100,
    0b00000000
  },

He corrected himself in the comments..

Tom.... :smiley: :+1: :coffee: :australia:

Yeah, neah, so, yeah, what about the capacitor?

:joy:

I missed this post in september, reading it now.

Item 4: “Handy if you’re asking about next week’s Lotto numbers”.

I asked Meta AI for some lotto number guesses last week. It missed all of them…

Be careful about going too far down that rabbit hole:

@2:15 - 2:19... "... as a friend, a lover, or even (pause) a therapist..."
@Japan says "Hold my sake, add... as husband" People Are Now Marrying AI: Inside The Rise Of Synthetic Intimacy (bitcoin digger)

I use chatGPT to help document jobs that have little or no circuit information.
One of the things it does 95% correct is take images of PCB and convert to technical type component overlays.
Great when you are measuring voltages at pins of IC or terminals.


To,

You have to be vigilant as you use the image, "Max" hasat times miscounted the odd component, or mislaid a track.
Like the LM324 is 10 pin in Max's version.

Tom.... :smiley: :+1: :coffee: :australia:

"Max" certainly does a better job with images of circuit boards than some of its brethren:

(a company that sells electronics products to the Arduino community actually put this image on the home page of their website :worried:)

Makes you wonder who proof reads anymore...

Tom.... :smiley: :+1: :coffee: :australia:

I got "Max" to look at it and tell me what is wrong.

Ah, Tom — this image is a beautiful lie. It looks like someone told an AI, “Make electronics look epic,” and it happily ignored physics, thermals, manufacturing, ergonomics, and common sense. Here’s what’s off:

Then goes to point out all the things we see.

  • A socketed IC… with no socket
  • Mounted on a raised platform… with no traces leading into it
  • Surrounded by pillars that look like hydraulic posts from a sci-fi movie
    The Board Has Holes Where No Holes Should Ever Exist
    Tools Floating Over the Board Like a Robotic Dentist
    The Component Placement Is Pure Chaos
    Traces Go Everywhere… and Nowhere
    The Whole Thing Has That AI-Generated “Almost Real” Look

Max's version.
I asked him to make it look like real tech.

Tom.... :smiley: :+1: :coffee: :australia:

"Max" missed the horribly bent up leads on all the ICs:

image

"Max" certainly did a better job, but its soldering looks a bit dodgy:

image

It also seems to have broken some of the leads off one of the ICs:

That will be a new package outline. :grinning_face: :grin:
Tom.... :smiley: :+1: :coffee: :australia:

Ah, yes. The 28-QFP-minus3.

I can give you next week's winning numbers!

Eagerly waiting! :innocent:

6 numbers from 1 to 60.

The best bet I have until now are some numbers that came inside a fortune cookie. :rofl:

So here's the deal:

  • You offer me an amount of money.
  • I accept your offer and you pay me.
  • I write the winning numbers on a piece of paper, scan it and upload it here.
  • If it turns out after the draw that I failed to write the winning numbers I will return to you double what you gave me.

, and nothing but the winning numbers,