Why not have a "rate a member" kind of system?
"Reputation management."
I believe that this sort of thing has been experimented with in forums (rate the questioners, rate the responders, etc.) It doesn't seem to have caught on much; I think it's too easy to "game" such a system. Eventually you end up with people like politicians, who spend all their time maintaining their reputation, but not actually doing anything ![]()
(For some questions, it's an attempt to get their homework done for them, and a late answer is considered no better than no answer at all. Sigh.)