I have realized that very few people have read forum guidelines. I had an idea... what if when a new user posts, there is a popup with the guidelines, and at the bottom, it asks the user for a random 'code' in the guidelines.
Maybe also have a timer to make sure they don't just scan for a random-looking bunch of characters quickly.
This won't ensure they read it, but it could make more people read the guidelines.
Nah, make it a lottery. Every 100th player wins a prize. Some compensation for a small pain. Or, set up a dunk tank and all the mean helpers take turns sitting over it. If you win, a meany gets dunked.
I’ve seen on another (non technical) forum a pop up with check boxes asking for positive confirmation (for the first 5 posts)
â–˘ my post meets the best practices described here (link to doc) and contains all the relevant information.
â–˘ my post uses code tags for code sections
â–˘ I posted text using relevant tags and did not include useless screen grabs of the IDE code or serial monitor
â–˘ I understand that failing to do so will likely result in not getting help at all.
Oops - edit againAll looks good. Post
It seems to work well enough to motivate newcomers to double check. Once in a while you get offenders who just tick the boxes without caring and then it’s pretty easy to moderate them out (close their post with “post not matching the guidelines. Click here to contact a moderator” comment).
Side note: in order to see this popup you should already have registered so it’s not a deterrent for registration and as you only see this when you have put in the hard work to write your request, you are more likely to want to proceed than if there is some sort of mandatory training before posting your first question.
Nope, it'd be way to stop lazy and/or disrespectful of the rules from joining the forum, stopping them to reduce unnecessary noise and let moderators avoid repeating always the same recommendations.
I don't see that as a negative thing...
and only put more energy in when lazy isn't fruitful. Sure. Only grease the squeaky wheel. So by allowing lazy, the forum encourages it; but by allowing lazy, it gets more 'action' on the forum. If the measure of success is the raw "post count", that's a good way forward. OTOH, if you measure the number of helpers who fade away in frustration, and measure success by an increase or decline in that count, I suspect you'll get a different forum. My suspicion is, the "successo-meter" isn't simply either.
YMMV