missing tool

i bought leonardo boards in the box there is a warranty that put all failures of smart project to the buyer of the board but as long as buyers can't check if the board itself is correct (mem access, instruction set, timing ...) this warranty is not legal ! as long as arduino buyers can't check the product with the arduino software the warranty should be that buyers don't have to use the product in anything to be legal that is a non-sens !!!

have you seen this - http://forum.arduino.cc/index.php?topic=73748.0 - You can check some basic functions.

thanks rob ok there is some test whith this user manip & code but tests for all arduino boards should be in arduino software without having nothing more than connect to the software if i make a drone for example it fly and it fall on the head of someone even if (s)he is not dead there is a process risk if what i did is ok the failure is the board so the warranty will be declared false and the board maker will have to pay i don't want that ;) so i repeat the warranty need full checking of arduino boards on arduino software to be legal i will test everything myself as soon as possible so no problem with me ;)

I think you're trolling.

can't check if the board itself is correct (mem access, instruction set, timing ...)

The functions you mention are withing the atmel chip, not "board level." Contact Atmel to see if they have a chip diagnostic. Don't expect them to fit on the chip at the same time as any reasonable application, though. Also review their policy about the use of their products in "critical" applications, which is probably similar to that of every other component on the board. Don't worry, if your Arduino-based autonomous drone crashes on someone's head, I'm pretty sure that pretty much everyone in the purchase chain will get sued, in the hopes that one of them will have enough money to make it worthwhile.

westfw i don't want ever/an/yone to pay for an error ;) i want no error for no one for my "critical" projects i will add the electronic in triple so failure will not kill

for my "critical" projects i will add the electronic in triple so failure will not kill

. . . and give my software spec to three different teams to implement, preferably in different languages on different processor architectures from different manufacturers.

hehe awo no need to go paranoid but as electronics can die for many reasons ...

AWOL:

for my "critical" projects i will add the electronic in triple so failure will not kill

. . . and give my software spec to three different teams to implement, preferably in different languages on different processor architectures from different manufacturers.

And they subcontract it to the same programmer somewhere who writes code for far less money.......