Clearly, not what he is suggesting. I think he's just making the same point others have made: With such a simple question, why didn't you answer it yourself empirically? Type in a short test program, run it, and see if it produces the desired result. That's what both of us mean when we say you should be answering some of these questions yourself. We just don't see that effort on your part, with you preferring us to spoon feed you answers rather than you making an effort to answer them yourself.
Perfect! You are unteachable, so why waste your time here? Most of us here are aware of the hierarchy: operands and operators --> expressions --> statements --> function blocks --> programs. Your view thrown out most of those and says operators are the same as functions. I'll bet you're a member of the Flat Earth Society, too. Your perception of what a function is and does is simply wrong. Since you stand alone with your incorrect view of what a function is, and tell us it won't do any good for us to tell you that you are wrong, it might be best for you to just move along...clearly, there's nothing here for you to see.
"With such a simple question..."
I explained that side of the store several times in this thread but you either didnt read it or did not understand it. I'll say it again, but i have a feeling that will just give you more fuel to complain :-)
I stated that the 'operator' referred to as modulo was documented differently than the other similar operators, and that modulo calculations are done in a different way than other types of 'operator' calculations. There is quite a wide variety of the way it is calculated. That means that i did not think i would be able to sufficiently test the 'operator' in a reasonable amount of time, so i queried the board. If it was a simpler 'operator' then it would probably not have led to that, but because it was more complex i felt that experienced users might have a better idea what to expect than i did. So in a way that's a complement to the people on this board, that they might know something that i did not know.
Do you understand now why i did not want to test this myself?