Hello,
i ve an arduino nano which is connected with the MPU6050 but the values aremuch too inaccurate, they are almost at random. I m using the example code :o
OK, thanks for letting us know.
AWOL:
OK, thanks for letting us know.
? Do you have a solution?
Get a better accelerometer?
Give the one you have a stern talking-to?
Readjust your expectations?
How do you know the values are inaccurate?
I've no idea - no-one told me what the specifications or what the actual readings were. (hint)
But where can i get a better one? On Amazon look all the same.
I thought the problem was the arduino......
YellowDev:
I thought the problem was the arduino......
How can you tell?(hint)
I had a 6050 in a phone a while back - seemed OK to me.
YellowDev:
Hello,
i ve an arduino nano which is connected with the MPU6050 but the values aremuch too inaccurate, they are almost at random. I m using the example code :o
Which example code?
Is this an MPU6050 from a reputable electronics supplier, or from a chinese eBay vendor? If the
latter there is a chance you have a knock-off (ie factory-reject) device.
I have worked with MPU6050 for quite sometime, although not using Arduino but a custom platform made using Atmel UC3 microcontrollers.
I had two of these sensors and they both worked fine; however, there was a difference between them. One was a Regular one but the other was an Engineering Sample. If memory serves right, the engineering sample had a lower bit ADC i.e. 14 bit instead of 16 bit.
I don't know about which kind you have but what makes you think that it is inaccurate? What data do you see?