Mysterious inclusion of deleted libraries

Exactly as you are instructed to do in the forum usage guide I linked in the other topic:

Just add a ``` on the line above and below any non-prose text (code, compiler output, command lines, etc.).

Here is the text as it should look when you are composing it for posting:

Yet in any error report, after 'Detecting libraries used...' I see two more entries have been 'discovered'

```
Alternatives for FireTimer.h: [FireTimer@1.0.5]

ResolveLibrary(FireTimer.h)

  -> candidates: [FireTimer@1.0.5]
```

```
Alternatives for OneButton.h: [OneButton@2.0.4]

ResolveLibrary(OneButton.h)

  -> candidates: [OneButton@2.0.4]
```

And here is how the forum software will render it:

Yet in any error report, after 'Detecting libraries used...' I see two more entries have been 'discovered'

Alternatives for FireTimer.h: [FireTimer@1.0.5]

ResolveLibrary(FireTimer.h)

  -> candidates: [FireTimer@1.0.5]
Alternatives for OneButton.h: [OneButton@2.0.4]

ResolveLibrary(OneButton.h)

  -> candidates: [OneButton@2.0.4]

Now if you would like to know why the text above the ----- ... stuff was converted to an H2 heading in your post, you can see it here:

https://www.markdownguide.org/basic-syntax/#alternate-syntax

If you would instead like to add a horizontal rule, make sure the line above is empty, like this:

  -> candidates: [FireTimer@1.0.5]

-----------------------------------

Which renders like this:

-> candidates: [FireTimer@1.0.5]


Horizontal rules can definitely be useful, but don't use them as a replacement for fencing on output.

1 Like