True that. Used hardware is the same as the top and as a lib so if I do the "UTFT_demo_480x320" from TFT_eSPI it takes 15.293 seconds, is that normal speed with SPI and that resolution? I can only compare to a 3.5" parallell one I have and in that case its night and day for even an more complex similar demo.
If I run fex:
tft.fillScreen(TFT_WHITE);
tft.fillScreen(TFT_BLACK);
tft.fillScreen(TFT_WHITE);
That takes around 2.5 seconds to complete and I can very easily see the changes. Shouldn't it go at least a little bit faster to fill a screen even over SPI?
If I run TFT_Char_times from the TFT_eSPI so does the last number with the biggest font take 21.689ms per character which is ok if I only need to change one digit but when several the time will surely increase to such degree that I guess it would just not be acceptable, as it fex is now with tft.fillScreen.