Well, just 50MHz. And just one AD-converter. That is at three/four channels used the sample rate goes down from 1GS/s to 250KS/s. At least the Siglent SDS 1104X-E has two AD-converters, so one may use 1 or 2 channels at 1GS/s, or 3 or 4 channels at 500KS/s.
Despite, I think Rigol and Siglent are pretty much comparable. From me the Rigols just don't "look" good - the front panel with all knobs etc. seems not well structured. But this is with what you work with. A quite personal thing, sure, ...
You have spent more time working with these scopes than me breathing, so the next time I'm buying me my first scope, I would surely take this words of wisdom into consideration
Also mind that a $10 logic analyzer combined with an application like PulseView is a fantastic thing to have when debugging 3V3 + 5V logic - check out this video.
So we come back to external logic analyzer, which I think is the better solution.
Despite, in case one want to use the scope for analyzing, say, an I2C-Bus already two scope channels will be occupied (for SDA and SCL). If there is a need/wish to check another signal on the same(!) screen, thus timely synchronized, only a four channel scope will do the job. Or this digital plugin.
I'm fine with LarryD's statement of 45 years experience that 2 channels are sufficient in most cases. My first scope had two as well - but the recent bought scope has four, and I already like it. One reason is: looking on a data bus AND something else.
Even though the two channel thing has another, positive, side effect: it forces you to really think(!) what you like to have a look at. Not just putting signals on the screen without knowing why.
That is my feeling also. The capabilities of a cheap clone analyzer + a PC are way beyond what a scope based one can do. This type of solution is scalable to higher channel counts and more advanced decoders compared to a scope based one. The only thing lacking is the ability to get good analogue performance highly time correlated to digital signals. Personally I don't need this often, and when I do, two or four scope channels is enough.
Logic analyzer probing above 10MHz or so is pretty challenging, and a solution under âŹ1,000 is probably not attainable.
Whoever mentioned the Rigol DS1054Z is on the right track. That plus a clone Salea 24MHz analyser and Sigrok is going to do the business. The 1054 can be upgraded to 100MHz and to have several useful decodes. Sigrok has 100s of decoders.
I will buy a salea logic analyzer and siglent SDS2102. I think 2 channel is enough for me(I can't afford SDS2104x-e. That is the real reason ). I will not use this in a company, I will use it for my projects. SDS2000x series has a touch screen that is a nice feature. SDS2000x series have 10 times higher memory depth and 2 times higher samplng rate than SD1000x series. Also I watched a lot of videos about SDS2000, SDS1000 and rigol DS1054z. In conclusion I liked the SDS2000 series.
Well, just a hint as you wrote about the SDS2102. Without X or X-E.
Siglent is introducing a newer generation of scopes, which can be, to my knowledge easily identified by lowest vertical sensitivity. 1mV/div is the "old" one while 500”V/div is the newer one.
On siglent.eu you may notice that pervious generation is lowered in price and almost sold out. But, talking about a 2-channel 200MHz scope with 2GS/s the Siglent SDS2102X-E might be right choice - and even cheaper than the older SDS2102X.
And check also possible application of "16 Channel logic probe module" ... as it has been on your wish list.