so, in a public sale (not ebay) in which goods or property are sold to the highest bidder, I opened an auction in order to sell a very old UNIX workstation of mine, asking to be contacted in private, classic "hi guys, interested? shoot me a pm, please"
then I put the same machine on ebay, in order to double my chances to achieve a good deal
… what happened next seems to be a TV novel like in an Ally McBeal, a super judge of the justice league assaulted me in private
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
"ah, dude, caught with your hands in the jam, you state correctly in the above mentioned ...
according to bazaar sale/trade rules, no software will be provided (hard drive wiped), the deal is for the hardware only
… but the flea bay auction clearly states that with the your workstation preinstalled together with software, and this means you are dishonest and fraudulent to members by offering the exact same system on two different sites with different conditions. You are deliberately bending the rules to allow the auction to be mentioned on our forum.
Now listen up, because i'm going to be very @#$!!@#!@# clear in my next statement:
Either you remove your auction in its entirety and without reappearance on this very forum, or remove the corresponding Ebay auction. Since our Hardware for Sale forum excludes reselling software, you cannot link to the ebay auction directly. You have to choose between Bazaar and Ebay for this item.
I give you until noon CET on friday the 22nd of April to comply fully. Failure to do so will result in court council pertaining, with a final punishment"
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Interesting points, different commercial offers, different prices, different opportunities, never thought in that way, never thought that offering different occasions in different places is "sneaky", like underhanded tactics in order to hide fraudulent intentions, but, since they have (hidden) rules, I was/am in the wrong.
Frankly I didn't know about that, mutually exclusive rules, and it sounds like a court case, [they] looked at the (hidden?) rules and got me on a technicality, a point of law or a small detail of a set of rules, their convictions were overturned on a technicality, and if one was selling, he/she too would have probably fell into the same trap.
What do you think about?
Is that super-judge-of-the-justice-league right? I am mean no doubt I am in the wrong according to their (hidden) rules, but can I be considered "dishonest" and "fraudulent" to members?
I was not in the position nor to hire Ally McBeal as personal lawyer neither to get a reply to my question (any Law tips ?), as result accuser vs dumb convicted, and he declared me to be guilty of a criminal offense by the verdict of judge in a court of law (verdict? judge? court of law? oh my goodness, is it a CandidCamera?), thus I was immediately condemned like an inmate to peel onions, and, and since I have to wear my t-shirt in white with black stripes during the whole 60 days of penalty of my account suspension, I wonder If I'd best send my CV to Fraudulent Incorporated (I might get a job there)
(my dry humor)