It is about the ZS-042 module with DS3231 and EEPROM chip.
I did a drift check against reliable time source and my RTC is losing 0.17 seconds per day (slow). I lose 1 second in 6 days. So, I'm going to try and adjust the aging offset to hopefully get a slightly better accuracy than this.
I think 1 second in 6 days or 0.17 sec per day is about 2 ppm, right?
If so, should I put the aging offset to -20 to try and speed up the clock? I think the adjustment of "1" of aging offset value is equivalent to approximately 0.1 ppm.
Please help. Thank you.
I did a drift check against reliable time source and my RTC is losing 0.17 seconds per day (slow).
Is that consistent over a range of temperatures ?
JohnElectronics:
I think 1 second in 6 days or 0.17 sec per day is about 2 ppm, right?
If so, should I put the aging offset to -20 to try and speed up the clock? I think the adjustment of "1" of aging offset value is equivalent to approximately 0.1 ppm.
That sounds right to me - assuming the temperature stays between about 10C and 30C (see the graph in the datasheet)
Yours,
TonyWilk
UKHeliBob:
Is that consistent over a range of temperatures ?
Not sure. I'm running the clock in an apartment. The temperature is around 20 deg C.
If you are in an apartment and are exceptionally concerned about accurate timekeeping, the best option may be a radio controlled clock set by WWVB.
As long as WWVB continues to exist, and can reset the clock, the clock stands to gain or lose a second about every 30 million years.
the clock stands to gain or lose a second about every 30 million years.
You could probably compensate for that if you could measure it accurately enough, but testing it would be a lengthy process 