Me and my peers are doing a small research about the difference between the original Arduino and the clone as a project for college. Could you please take the time to answer these questions? It only takes less than five minutes.
Do note that many supposed "clones" are misleadingly advertised as "UNOs" when they are in fact, nothing like a UNO but rather a variant of the earlier - and perfectly functional - Duemilanove.
The UNO is distinguished by the presence of the 16U2 (or earlier) secondary microprocessor programmed as a USB to serial "bridge". Without this, it is mendaciously misleading to refer to the device as a "UNO" as it lacks UNO functionality which includes the option to program the 16U2 for additional functions such as a HID.
Of course, many fakes (as distinct from actual clones) use the CH340 instead of the undesirable FT232 which requires a different driver but is otherwise a perfectly functional replacement.