# Slow PCA9685 Servo project

**URL:** <https://forum.arduino.cc/t/slow-pca9685-servo-project/1441604>\
**Category:** General Guidance\
**Created:** [April 26, 2026, 2:18pm UTC](https://forum.arduino.cc/t/slow-pca9685-servo-project/1441604 "2026-04-26T14:18:57Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 3\
**Page:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![jim-p](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/arduino/user_avatar/forum.arduino.cc/jim-p/32/922840_2.png) [@jim-p](https://forum.arduino.cc/u/jim-p)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2026, 1:03pm UTC](https://forum.arduino.cc/t/slow-pca9685-servo-project/1441604/21 "2026-04-29T13:03:20Z")

</div>

> [@bipbop12](#):
>
> And a big plus that I didnt have to do any hardware changes.

and you still have the option of operating each one individually if you later need to.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![PaulRB](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/arduino/user_avatar/forum.arduino.cc/paulrb/32/216330_2.png) [@PaulRB](https://forum.arduino.cc/u/PaulRB)\
**Post date:** [April 29, 2026, 2:58pm UTC](https://forum.arduino.cc/t/slow-pca9685-servo-project/1441604/22 "2026-04-29T14:58:59Z")

</div>

> [@jim-p](#):
>
> Are you impling my solution is too complicated?

No, @bipbop12 's design is too complicated. Your suggestion mitigates the performance problem that design has caused. But it would not be needed if @bipbop12 abandoned the current over-complicated design in favour of a far simpler one.

---

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![system](https://dub1.discourse-cdn.com/arduino/user_avatar/forum.arduino.cc/system/32/1140315_2.png) [@system](https://forum.arduino.cc/u/system)\
**Post date:** [October 26, 2026, 3:27pm UTC](https://forum.arduino.cc/t/slow-pca9685-servo-project/1441604/24 "2026-10-26T15:27:09Z")

</div>

Closed on October 26, 2026, 3:27pm UTC

This topic was automatically closed 180 days after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.

[Previous page](https://forum.arduino.cc/t/slow-pca9685-servo-project/1441604.md?page=1)