First off thanks for all the help and thought you guys have put into helping me. It is greatly appreciated and blows me away! I've been gone dealing with 2 young kids the last few days.
Do you have to decode the signal at all ?
No,just load it back into the processor.
The waveform you displayed has about a 1V peak to peak,
That was a mistaken setting. The peak to peak off the data waveform is around 5V. Sorry for the misleading photo.
The frequency of the squarewave is 2083hz
The Sequencer saves 2 things to tape. It stores the patch settings and it saves the note information. My guess is that it sends the patch info first, then at the end it sends the note info. The data I recorded always has the same layout: 1/0s, chunk of data, around minute of 1/0s, second chunk of data. I think the long chunk of 1/0s is blank memory. The tape can store several thousand notes, I only put in a few to test. I think this minute of blank space would be filled up if I put in more notes.
So assuming it is Manchester encoding and I do not need to decode the data which way do you think would be best to proceed? Should I deal with it as raw data or go the audio route?
Thanks in advance!