In the bike course the student is guided to think the motor input is more or less equivalent to torque when it's a pwm ratio on voltage. Voltage is not that simply linked to torque, i think it's a bad shortcut.
PWM ratio will modulate tension which is somehow related to speed via back EMF and very loosely correlated to torque which would be more related to current.
Previous example are better made in that sense they give the student the feel that pwm and speed are somehow correlated, without ever stating it obviously, leaving room for more detailed course later. Also the assumption pwm/speed is much more true than pwm/torque which work only at very low speed.
Also the course explain that the wheel is not accelerating constantly because of friction when it's mainly from back EMF effect.
I think it's fair not to want to explain everything in detail to student discovering engineering but it would be better to avoid telling false things. If you think it would be too long or unproductive find a better way by hiding some of the concepts, it's better than to be wrong.
Also as teacher we need a way to manipulate the material of the course. For many reasons I won't use it as is so i won't be able to use this pretty e learning platform. i'll have to copy paste and rewrite most of the course and consequently find another way to distribute the course.