Coremark Comparision

Official Hardware UNO Family UNO R4 WiFi
1

Decided to run a coremark comparison using the wifi board as a base:

Teensy 3.2 (48Mhz -0s)  -  86.23
Teensy 3.2 (48Mhz -02)  - 116.07

Feather M0 (48Mhz -0s)  -   48.61
Feather M0 (48Mhz -02)  -   83.85

CH32V307 Eval(48Mhz -0s) - 91.80
CH32V307 Eval(48Mhz -02) - 116.52

Uno R4 WiFi (48Mhz, -0s) -  81.81
Uno R4 WiFi (48Mhz, -02) - 106.74

UnoR4 Minima (-0s) - 81.80
UnoR4 Minima (-02) - 106.73
2

2 posts were merged into an existing topic: Changing Compiler Optimizations Had No Affect

3

After discussion on Github I redid the coremarks for the R4 boards. Minima and WiFi have been updated accordingly.