It seems that you first need to gain a rudimentary understanding of how a real time, multi-tasking operating system works. I recommend that you start by reading "Mastering the FreeRTOS Real Time Kernel - a Hands On Tutorial Guide" located HERE.
Then, look at changes made to vanilla FreeRTOS by Espresif to support multiple cores, Starting Here.
Thank you very much for encouraging me to undertake readings on "Computer Operating System" especially on multi-tasking one. I have had some exposure on single-tasking/multi-tasking OS from the Masters Course Work about 30 years ago most of which must had been faded in the meantime. Now, I will have the opportunity to make an objective review on the functioning of the same by virtue of ESP32 Platform.
There are data sheets and yet a manufacturer prepares application notes to boost the usages of their product (s) because of the bureaucratic write-up style of the data sheets from which a potential user can not easily infer required information for building a prototype.
If we recall Intel's approach -- when they launched 8085 Microprocessor, they concurrently released SDK-85 Development Kit and they did the same thing for 8086 by releasing SDK-86.
For the case of Microchip, we don't see many countable application notes in favor of their popular ATmega328P MCU except the voluminous data sheets which are not much useful for inexperienced users.
Likewise, we don't see many user friendly application notes from arduino.cc in favor of the popular Arduino UNO Learning Kit except some IDE Examples and Arduino Reference Manual.
We (the learners) are lucky to have a number of Tutors who post online tutorials for Arduino most of which can be followed against a check list to reach at the desired result.
Now-a-days, ChatGPT (at least to me) supplies useful information in simple English though only 70% is correct on an average in the view of an anonymous Arduino Forum Member.
there is such a thing as bureaucratic writing style and studies about it (here is one)
he is expressing his perception of those documents, you might disagree and find them easy and pleasant to read, but I don't see why you would ask him not to use that particular wording...
Simplified technical English, as used in data sheets, is easy to read and understand, even for non-native English speakers. It is not pleasant to read for newbies, some technical knowledge is required.
Make that "well-written datasheets". In 35+ years of engineering I've had to deal with plenty of datasheets that are absolute crap. That's where a good FAE can be worth his weight in gold.
I worked overseas for many years with a renowned Oil Service Company who maintained a dedicated department/team at the Head Quarter to prepare FAE (Field Application Engineering Manuals) to minimize down time by providing quick indices and measures for the operations of the equipment as well as trouble shooting and repairing.