My first venture into Arduino was with a Sparkfun Redboard. Decided to buy real Arduinos to support arduino.cc a little more.
They arrived yesterday and to my dismay they were arduino.org ones And yes, I did check the images on the website before ordering. OK, next time better. I will inform the supplier.
On a positive note, no connectivity issues using IDE 1.6.6 and Win8.
It is not an Authentic Uno R3 if it is SMD.
A R3 has the ATMega in DIL package.
And if it is SMD it also most likely has a CH340 USB/serial converter chip, which is not supported by the Arduino IDE install package.
So you need to install drivers for that before anything else, there's questions coming in here about that every other day.
It is not an Authentic Uno R3 if it is SMD.
A R3 has the ATMega in DIL package.
And if it is SMD it also most likely has a CH340 USB/serial converter chip, which is not supported by the Arduino IDE install package.
So you need to install drivers for that before anything else, there's questions coming in here about that every other day.
Of course, I've noticed right away, but the buyers only after they received it (and not all of them).
I mean really, what's the issue with writing straight away that it is a clone instead of deceiving.
I buy those $3 small nano from ebay with CH340 and mini USB and simply solder them as a block to my PCBs. A barebone DIY -duino made from digikey parts would cost me more than twice.
In the USA I believe the only way to be guaranteed getting an Arduino made for arduino.cc would be order it from arduino.cc or order it from Adafruit. That is because Adafruit makes the Arduino boards for arduino.cc. All other Arduino boards are counterfeit or from arduino.org. Sparkfun, which is a USA based company, sells arduino.org boards. Is there some specific manufacturer in Europe that sells boards that are known for a fact to be arduino.cc boards, in addition to buying from the arduino.cc site? Is it easier to get a Genuino board because nobody is counterfeiting the Genuino brand?
Yeah, I'm disappointed.
I like what Arduino.cc has been doing with the SW and IDE, but they have pretty much failed to recover or replaced their manufacturing and distribution capability. Arduino.org seems to have the manufacturing in hand (largely via the distributors like Digikey, Newark, Mouser), and has "produced" some interesting new hardware, but their software and community efforts are pretty pathetic.
Meanwhile the 'well behaved' OSHW vendors like Adafruit and Sparkfun are selling a combination of .org products, .cc products, and their own versions ("Metro", "feather", "Redboard") that Arduino.cc won't accept royalties for (according to the Sparkfun Redboard product page Q&A.
GoForSmoke:
So I was REALLY HAPPY when the IDE download page accepts donations that every bit goes to Arduino.cc.
How many Uno boards would I need to buy to get them $25 in royalties?
If they need a little extra cash (or a lot), a single ad at the bottom of each forum page would do wonders. Its not cluttering up the page and could generate a lot of income on this quite busy site. Ads on sites that give me some value do not bother me, take the StackExchange sites for instance.
Just the impressions (CPM) would bring in something.
@Brosco
Maybe because the makers of clones contribute nothing to this site or to the development of the platform.
Some openly counterfeit the products saying their offerings are made by the original developers.
.